Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24992733›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2014

Cardiotoxicity of antineoplastic agents: what is the present and future role for imaging?

Timothy M Markman, Maurie Markman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Does diastolic dysfunction precede systolic dysfunction in trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity? Assessment with multigated radionuclide angiography (MUGA).Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy M Markman
Maurie Markman
Drexel University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As antineoplastic treatment options expand at an increasing rate, both traditional and novel agents continue to be limited by their cardiotoxic effects. While functional decline becomes clinically apparent at late states of toxicity, little is known about early stages during which treatment or prevention may still be an option. Several imaging modalities,including echocardiography, multiple gated acquisition, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging have the ability to identify cardiac effects before they produce clinical symptoms.Here we discuss the current and future role of cardiac imaging in the assessment of cardiotoxicity of antineoplastic agents. effects on cardiac tissue, resulting in myocardial cellular damage,and ultimately lead to a wide range of effects including electrophysiological abnormalities, symptomatic heart failure(HF), and even death. This represents a limiting factor in the therapy of several otherwise treatable neoplasms [2].The cardiotoxicity of antineoplastic agents raises several important questions regarding the actual prevalence of cardiac toxicity, the ability to effectively treat or prevent such effects with pharmaceutical interventions, and the availability of a means for early diagnosis. Here, we focus on the latter, specifically examining current and potential future imaging strategies to detect the cardiac effects of chemotherapeutic agents.

Indexed as

Cardiac Imaging TechniquesAntineoplastic AgentsCardiotoxicityHeart DiseasesHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID24992733
OpenAlexW1976202060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.