ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Regulation of the nucleosome repeat length in vivo by the DNA sequence, protein concentrations and long-range interactions.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Decoding gene responsiveness to synthetic chromatin reader-actuators with multi-modal epigenomic profiling.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- DNA Sequence and Histone Variant H2A.Z Jointly Govern Nucleosome Unwrapping Pathways.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- SoPPIs: a highly parallelized protein-protein-interaction screening method in prokaryotic and eukaryotic hosts.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Deciphering chromatin architecture and dynamics in Plasmodium falciparum using the nucDetective pipeline.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Nucleosome spacing across cell types, diseases, and ages.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
- Chromatin higher-order folding as influenced by preferred values of linker DNA.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025Review
- A chromatin fiber model explains cell-free DNA fragmentation signatures of active regulatory elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Single-Cell Transcriptomic Approaches for Decoding Non-Coding RNA Mechanisms in Colorectal Cancer.Non-coding RNA · 2025Review
- Ultraviolet damage and repair maps inGenome research · 2025Article
- Understanding and Simulating the Dynamics of a Polymer-Like Chromatin.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Population-scale skeletal muscle single-nucleus multi-omic profiling reveals extensive context specific genetic regulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Study of Dispersed Repeats in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Nucleosome reorganisation in breast cancer tissues.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- Local Volume Concentration, Packing Domains and Scaling Properties of Chromatin.Research square · 2023Article
- A distinct circular DNA profile intersects with proteome changes in the genotoxic stress-related hSOD1Cell & bioscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nucleosome repeat length (NRL) is an integral chromatin property important for its biological functions. Recent experiments revealed several conflicting trends of the NRL dependence on the concentrations of histones and other architectural chromatin proteins, both in vitro and in vivo, but a systematic theoretical description of NRL as a function of DNA sequence and epigenetic determinants is currently lacking. To address this problem, we have performed an integrative biophysical and bioinformatics analysis in species ranging from yeast to frog to mouse where NRL was studied as a function of various parameters. We show that in simple eukaryotes such as yeast, a lower limit for the NRL value exists, determined by internucleosome interactions and remodeler action. For higher eukaryotes, also the upper limit exists since NRL is an increasing but saturating function of the linker histone concentration. Counterintuitively, smaller H1 variants or non-histone architectural proteins can initiate larger effects on the NRL due to entropic reasons. Furthermore, we demonstrate that different regimes of the NRL dependence on histone concentrations exist depending on whether DNA sequence-specific effects dominate over boundary effects or vice versa. We consider several classes of genomic regions with apparently different regimes of the NRL variation. As one extreme, our analysis reveals that the period of oscillations of the nucleosome density around bound RNA polymerase coincides with the period of oscillations of positioning sites of the corresponding DNA sequence. At another extreme, we show that although mouse major satellite repeats intrinsically encode well-defined nucleosome preferences, they have no unique nucleosome arrangement and can undergo a switch between two distinct types of nucleosome positioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.