Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24992337›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Meiosis-specific cohesin component, Stag3 is essential for maintaining centromere chromatid cohesion, and required for DNA repair and synapsis between homologous chromosomes.

Jessica Hopkins, Grace Hwang, Justin Jacob, Nicklas Sapp, Rick Bedigian, Kazuhiro Oka, Paul Overbeek, Steve Murray, Philip W Jordan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Meiotic gene expression ofInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The mitotic STAG3-cohesin complex shapes male germline nucleome.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica HopkinsDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Grace HwangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Justin JacobDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Nicklas SappDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Rick BedigianThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, United States of America.
Kazuhiro OkaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Paul OverbeekDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Steve MurrayThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, United States of America.
Philip W JordanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USJackson Laboratory · US

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Anna Karolina Palucka · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
High Throughput Production and Cryopreservation of Knockout MiceU42OD011185 · OD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI MURRAY, STEPHEN A, TAFT, ROBERT A · 2012 to 2015
$17.9M
TRAINING IN AREAS FUNDAMENTAL TO CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009110 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MATUNIS, MICHAEL J., WEERARATNA, ASHANI T · 1985 to 2025
$13.1M
The SMC5/6 Complex - DNA Damage Response Regulation Ensures Meiotic FidelityR00HD069458 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JORDAN, PHILIP W · 2013 to 2015
$613k
The SMC5/6 Complex - DNA Damage Response Regulation Ensures Meiotic FidelityK99HD069458 · NICHD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI JORDAN, PHILIP W · 2011 to 2012
$180k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009110NICHD NIH HHS HD069458NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD069458NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD069458NIH HHS OD011985NIH HHS U42 OD011185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cohesins are important for chromosome structure and chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis. Cohesins are composed of two structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC1-SMC3) proteins that form a V-shaped heterodimer structure, which is bridged by a α-kleisin protein and a stromal antigen (STAG) protein. Previous studies in mouse have shown that there is one SMC1 protein (SMC1β), two α-kleisins (RAD21L and REC8) and one STAG protein (STAG3) that are meiosis-specific. During meiosis, homologous chromosomes must recombine with one another in the context of a tripartite structure known as the synaptonemal complex (SC). From interaction studies, it has been shown that there are at least four meiosis-specific forms of cohesin, which together with the mitotic cohesin complex, are lateral components of the SC. STAG3 is the only meiosis-specific subunit that is represented within all four meiosis-specific cohesin complexes. In Stag3 mutant germ cells, the protein level of other meiosis-specific cohesin subunits (SMC1β, RAD21L and REC8) is reduced, and their localization to chromosome axes is disrupted. In contrast, the mitotic cohesin complex remains intact and localizes robustly to the meiotic chromosome axes. The instability of meiosis-specific cohesins observed in Stag3 mutants results in aberrant DNA repair processes, and disruption of synapsis between homologous chromosomes. Furthermore, mutation of Stag3 results in perturbation of pericentromeric heterochromatin clustering, and disruption of centromere cohesion between sister chromatids during meiotic prophase. These defects result in early prophase I arrest and apoptosis in both male and female germ cells. The meiotic defects observed in Stag3 mutants are more severe when compared to single mutants for Smc1β, Rec8 and Rad21l, however they are not as severe as the Rec8, Rad21l double mutants. Taken together, our study demonstrates that STAG3 is required for the stability of all meiosis-specific cohesin complexes. Furthermore, our data suggests that STAG3 is required for structural changes of chromosomes that mediate chromosome pairing and synapsis, DNA repair and progression of meiosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsCentromereChromatidsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosome PairingCohesinsDNA RepairMeiosisMiceMultiprotein ComplexesMutationNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsMultiprotein ComplexesNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsRAD21L protein, mouseRec8 protein, mouseSmc1l2 protein, mouseStag3 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID24992337
PMCPMC4081007
OpenAlexW2028597364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.