Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24992335›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Amniotic membrane grafts for the prevention of esophageal stricture after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Maximilien Barret, Carlos Alberto Pratico, Marine Camus, Frédéric Beuvon, Mohamed Jarraya, Carole Nicco, Luigi Mangialavori, Stanislas Chaussade, Frédéric Batteux, Frédéric Prat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biological properties and surgical applications of the human amniotic membrane.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maximilien BarretDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France; Faculté Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Carlos Alberto PraticoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France; Faculté Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Marine CamusDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France; Faculté Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Frédéric BeuvonFaculté Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
Mohamed JarrayaHuman Tissue Bank, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Carole NiccoFaculté Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Department of Immunology and EA 1833, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
Luigi MangialavoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
Stanislas ChaussadeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France; Faculté Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Frédéric BatteuxFaculté Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Department of Immunology and EA 1833, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
Frédéric PratDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France; Faculté Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Délégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Cochin · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe prevention of esophageal strictures following circumferential mucosal resection remains a major clinical challenge. Human amniotic membrane (AM) is an easily available material, which is widely used in ophthalmology due to its wound healing, anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties. We studied the effect of AM grafts in the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in a swine model. ANIMALS AND

methodsIn this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 20 swine underwent a 5 cm-long circumferential ESD of the lower esophagus. In the AM Group (n = 10), amniotic membrane grafts were placed on esophageal stents; a subgroup of 5 swine (AM 1 group) was sacrificed on day 14, whereas the other 5 animals (AM 2 group) were kept alive. The esophageal stent (ES) group (n = 5) had ES placement alone after ESD. Another 5 animals served as a control group with only ESD.

resultsThe prevalence of symptomatic strictures at day 14 was significantly reduced in the AM group and ES groups vs. the control group (33%, 40% and 100%, respectively, p = 0.03); mean esophageal diameter was 5.8±3.6 mm, 6.8±3.3 mm, and 2.6±1.7 mm for AM, ES, and control groups, respectively. Median (range) esophageal fibrosis thickness was 0.87 mm (0.78-1.72), 1.19 mm (0.28-1.95), and 1.65 mm (0.7-1.79) for AM 1, ES, and control groups, respectively. All animals had developed esophageal strictures by day 35.

conclusionsThe anti-fibrotic effect of AM on esophageal wound healing after ESD delayed the development of esophageal stricture in our model. However, this benefit was of limited duration in the conditions of our study.

Indexed as

AmnionAnimalsDissectionEsophageal StenosisEsophagoscopyEsophagusHumansOxidative StressPostoperative ComplicationsRandom AllocationSwineTransplantsWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID24992335
PMCPMC4081114
OpenAlexW2084284301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.