Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24992096›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2014

Flux profiling of photosynthetic carbon metabolism in intact plants.

Robert Heise, Stéphanie Arrivault, Marek Szecowka, Takayuki Tohge, Adriano Nunes-Nesi, Mark Stitt, Zoran Nikoloski, Alisdair R Fernie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Age-based approach to characterize the dynamics of cellular processes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Stable Isotope Labeling and Quantification of Photosynthetic Metabolites.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Bio-protocol · 2023
    Article
  6. Evolution of gene regulatory network of CPlant communications · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  15. Photorespiration: The Futile Cycle?Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Recent Advances in Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism in C3 Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert Heise1] Max Planck Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm, Germany. [2].
Stéphanie Arrivault1] Max Planck Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm, Germany. [2].
Marek Szecowka1] Max Planck Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm, Germany. [2].
Takayuki TohgeMax Planck Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.
Adriano Nunes-Nesi1] Max Planck Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm, Germany. [2] Present address: Max Planck partner group, Departamento de Biologia Vegetal Universidade Federal de Viçosa MG, Brasil.
Mark Stitt1] Max Planck Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm, Germany. [2].
Zoran Nikoloski1] Max Planck Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm, Germany. [2].
Alisdair R Fernie1] Max Planck Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm, Germany. [2].

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flux analysis has been carried out in plants for decades, but technical innovations are now enabling it to be carried out in photosynthetic tissues in a more precise fashion with respect to the number of metabolites measured. Here we describe a protocol, using gas chromatography (GC)- and liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS), to resolve intracellular fluxes of the central carbon metabolism in illuminated intact Arabidopsis thaliana rosettes using the time course of the unlabeled fractions in 40 major constituents of the metabolome after switching to (13)CO2. We additionally simplify modeling assumptions, specifically to cope with the presence of multiple cellular compartments. We summarize all steps in this 8-10-week-long process, including setting up the chamber; harvesting; liquid extraction and subsequent handling of sample plant material to chemical derivatization procedures such as silylation and methoxymation (necessary for gas chromatography only); choosing instrumentation settings and evaluating the resultant chromatogram in terms of both unlabeled and labeled peaks. Furthermore, we describe how quantitative insights can be gained by estimating both benchmark and previously unknown fluxes from collected data sets.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisCarbonChromatography, GasChromatography, LiquidMass SpectrometryMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetabolomicsMonte Carlo MethodCarbon

Identifiers

PMID24992096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.