Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24991940›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2014

Engineering genetically encoded FRET sensors.

Laurens Lindenburg, Maarten Merkx

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Studying Chromatin Epigenetics with Fluorescence Microscopy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cell Tracking for Organoids: Lessons From Developmental Biology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. CUTie2: The Attack of the Cyclic Nucleotide Sensor Clones.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laurens LindenburgLaboratory of Chemical Biology and Institute of Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5600MB, The Netherlands. laurens.lindenburg@googlemail.com.
Maarten MerkxLaboratory of Chemical Biology and Institute of Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5600MB, The Netherlands. m.merkx@tue.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) between two fluorescent proteins can be exploited to create fully genetically encoded and thus subcellularly targetable sensors. FRET sensors report changes in energy transfer between a donor and an acceptor fluorescent protein that occur when an attached sensor domain undergoes a change in conformation in response to ligand binding. The design of sensitive FRET sensors remains challenging as there are few generally applicable design rules and each sensor must be optimized anew. In this review we discuss various strategies that address this shortcoming, including rational design approaches that exploit self-associating fluorescent domains and the directed evolution of FRET sensors using high-throughput screening.

Indexed as

AnimalsFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHumansLuminescent ProteinsMolecular ImagingProtein EngineeringProtein Interaction MappingLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24991940
PMCPMC4168480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.