Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24991835›Full record

ArticleAutophagy2014

Combined autophagy and HDAC inhibition: a phase I safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic analysis of hydroxychloroquine in combination with the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Devalingam Mahalingam, Monica Mita, John Sarantopoulos, Leslie Wood, Ravi K Amaravadi, Lisa E Davis, Alain C Mita, Tyler J Curiel, Claudia M Espitia, Steffan T Nawrocki and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Autophagy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 188 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
188citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

188 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 285 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

128 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Devalingam MahalingamCancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center; San Antonio, TX USA.
Monica MitaCancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center; San Antonio, TX USA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA USA.
John SarantopoulosCancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center; San Antonio, TX USA.
Leslie WoodCancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center; San Antonio, TX USA.
Ravi K AmaravadiAbramson Cancer Center and Department of Medicine; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA USA.
Lisa E DavisUniversity of the Sciences; Philadelphia, PA USA.
Alain C MitaCancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center; San Antonio, TX USA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA USA.
Tyler J CurielCancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center; San Antonio, TX USA.
Claudia M EspitiaCancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center; San Antonio, TX USA.
Steffan T NawrockiCancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center; San Antonio, TX USA.
Francis J GilesCancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center; San Antonio, TX USA; Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center; Northwestern University; Chicago, IL USA.
Jennifer S CarewCancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center; San Antonio, TX USA; Taussig Cancer Institute; Cleveland Clinic; Cleveland, OH USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas System · USCalifornia University of Pennsylvania · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern UniversityUniversity of the Sciences · US

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Robin Jean Leach · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
Inhibition of Autophagy: A Novel Therapeutic Strategy for Advanced Solid TumorsR21CA139476 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI MAHALINGAM, DEVALINGAM · 2009 to 2010
$655k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174NCI NIH HHS P30CA054174NCI NIH HHS R21 CA139476NCI NIH HHS R21CA139476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported that inhibition of autophagy significantly augmented the anticancer activity of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor vorinostat (VOR) through a cathepsin D-mediated mechanism. We thus conducted a first-in-human study to investigate the safety, preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the combination of the autophagy inhibitor hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and VOR in patients with advanced solid tumors. Of 27 patients treated in the study, 24 were considered fully evaluable for study assessments and toxicity. Patients were treated orally with escalating doses of HCQ daily (QD) (d 2 to 21 of a 21-d cycle) in combination with 400 mg VOR QD (d one to 21). Treatment-related adverse events (AE) included grade 1 to 2 nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, weight loss, anemia, and elevated creatinine. Grade 3 fatigue and/or myelosuppression were observed in a minority of patients. Fatigue and gastrointestinal AE were dose-limiting toxicities. Six-hundred milligrams HCQ and 400 mg VOR was established as the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II regimen. One patient with renal cell carcinoma had a confirmed durable partial response and 2 patients with colorectal cancer had prolonged stable disease. The addition of HCQ did not significantly impact the PK profile of VOR. Treatment-related increases in the expression of CDKN1A and CTSD were more pronounced in tumor biopsies than peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Based on the safety and preliminary efficacy of this combination, additional clinical studies are currently being planned to further investigate autophagy inhibition as a new approach to increase the efficacy of HDAC inhibitors.

Indexed as

AutophagyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDemographyFemaleHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansHydroxamic AcidsHydroxychloroquineMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsHydroxychloroquineNeoplasm ProteinsVorinostatautophagycancerclinical trialhydroxychloroquinevorinostat

Identifiers

PMID24991835
PMCPMC4203517
OpenAlexW1608798960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.