Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24991821›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

BiP clustering facilitates protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum.

Marc Griesemer, Carissa Young, Anne S Robinson, Linda Petzold

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Effects of Disrupting CaMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Mechanisms and regulation of the Hsp70 chaperone network.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Force-regulated chaperone activity of BiP/ERdj3 is opposite to their homologs DnaK/DnaJ.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The virtual cell based assay: Current status and future perspectives.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marc GriesemerDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of California, Merced, Merced, California, United States of America.
Carissa YoungDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.
Anne S RobinsonDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.
Linda PetzoldDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Tulane University · USUniversity of California, Merced · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · USUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

TOWARDS SOLID-STATE NMR STRUCTURES OF GPCRSP20RR015588 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI ROZOVSKY, SHARON · 2000 to 2009
$18.2M
Stochastic Modeling of Protein Interactions in the ERR01GM075297 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI ROBINSON, ANNE SKAJA · 2005 to 2008
$914k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR015588NCRR NIH HHS P20RR015588NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075297NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM75297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chaperone BiP participates in several regulatory processes within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER): translocation, protein folding, and ER-associated degradation. To facilitate protein folding, a cooperative mechanism known as entropic pulling has been proposed to demonstrate the molecular-level understanding of how multiple BiP molecules bind to nascent and unfolded proteins. Recently, experimental evidence revealed the spatial heterogeneity of BiP within the nuclear and peripheral ER of S. cerevisiae (commonly referred to as 'clusters'). Here, we developed a model to evaluate the potential advantages of accounting for multiple BiP molecules binding to peptides, while proposing that BiP's spatial heterogeneity may enhance protein folding and maturation. Scenarios were simulated to gauge the effectiveness of binding multiple chaperone molecules to peptides. Using two metrics: folding efficiency and chaperone cost, we determined that the single binding site model achieves a higher efficiency than models characterized by multiple binding sites, in the absence of cooperativity. Due to entropic pulling, however, multiple chaperones perform in concert to facilitate the resolubilization and ultimate yield of folded proteins. As a result of cooperativity, multiple binding site models used fewer BiP molecules and maintained a higher folding efficiency than the single binding site model. These insilico investigations reveal that clusters of BiP molecules bound to unfolded proteins may enhance folding efficiency through cooperative action via entropic pulling.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingComputational BiologyEndoplasmic ReticulumEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHeat-Shock ProteinsModels, BiologicalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHeat-Shock ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24991821
PMCPMC4081015
OpenAlexW2100698177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.