Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24991813›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Nucleosomes shape DNA polymorphism and divergence.

Sasha A Langley, Gary H Karpen, Charles H Langley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dinucleotide preferences underlie apparent codon preference reversals in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How Can We Resolve Lewontin's Paradox?Genome biology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Slow motions in A·T rich DNA sequence.Scientific reports · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Human exonization through differential nucleosome occupancy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sasha A LangleyLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Gary H KarpenLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America; Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California - Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Charles H LangleyDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California - Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Drosophila Population GenomicsR01HG002942 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LANGLEY, CHARLES HUNT · 2004 to 2011
$8.2M
Determinants of Centromere Identity in DrosophilaR01GM066272 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI KARPEN, GARY H · 2004 to 2011
$3.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG02942NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002942NIGMS NIH HHS GM066272NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An estimated 80% of genomic DNA in eukaryotes is packaged as nucleosomes, which, together with the remaining interstitial linker regions, generate higher order chromatin structures [1]. Nucleosome sequences isolated from diverse organisms exhibit ∼10 bp periodic variations in AA, TT and GC dinucleotide frequencies. These sequence elements generate intrinsically curved DNA and help establish the histone-DNA interface. We investigated an important unanswered question concerning the interplay between chromatin organization and genome evolution: do the DNA sequence preferences inherent to the highly conserved histone core exert detectable natural selection on genomic divergence and polymorphism? To address this hypothesis, we isolated nucleosomal DNA sequences from Drosophila melanogaster embryos and examined the underlying genomic variation within and between species. We found that divergence along the D. melanogaster lineage is periodic across nucleosome regions with base changes following preferred nucleotides, providing new evidence for systematic evolutionary forces in the generation and maintenance of nucleosome-associated dinucleotide periodicities. Further, Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) frequency spectra show striking periodicities across nucleosomal regions, paralleling divergence patterns. Preferred alleles occur at higher frequencies in natural populations, consistent with a central role for natural selection. These patterns are stronger for nucleosomes in introns than in intergenic regions, suggesting selection is stronger in transcribed regions where nucleosomes undergo more displacement, remodeling and functional modification. In addition, we observe a large-scale (∼180 bp) periodic enrichment of AA/TT dinucleotides associated with nucleosome occupancy, while GC dinucleotide frequency peaks in linker regions. Divergence and polymorphism data also support a role for natural selection in the generation and maintenance of these super-nucleosomal patterns. Our results demonstrate that nucleosome-associated sequence periodicities are under selective pressure, implying that structural interactions between nucleosomes and DNA sequence shape sequence evolution, particularly in introns.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSelection, GeneticAnimalsChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNADrosophila melanogasterIntronsNucleosomesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideChromatinDNANucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID24991813
PMCPMC4081404
OpenAlexW2127824499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.