Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24991623›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in pharmacy practice2013

Medication reconciliation and prescribing reviews by pharmacy technicians in a geriatric ward.

Thomas Croft Buck, Louise Smed Gronkjaer, Marie-Louise Duckert, Jens-Ulrik Rosholm, Lise Aagaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in pharmacy practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Roles and impact of pharmacy technicians on hospital wards: a systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Health Care Providers' Attitude and Satisfaction Toward Patient-Oriented Services Provided by Pharmacy Technicians at Three Faith-Based Hospitals.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas Croft BuckDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Odense University Hospital Pharmacy, Odense, Denmark ; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Hospitals Unit for Quality Assurance of Medicines Use, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Louise Smed GronkjaerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Odense University Hospital Pharmacy, Odense, Denmark ; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Hospitals Unit for Quality Assurance of Medicines Use, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Marie-Louise DuckertDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Odense University Hospital Pharmacy, Odense, Denmark ; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Hospitals Unit for Quality Assurance of Medicines Use, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jens-Ulrik RosholmDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lise AagaardDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hospitals Unit for Quality Assurance of Medicines Use, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark ; Clinical pharmacology, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIncomplete medication histories obtained on hospital admission are responsible for more than 25% of prescribing errors. This study aimed to evaluate whether pharmacy technicians can assist hospital physicians' in obtaining medication histories by performing medication reconciliation and prescribing reviews. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether the interventions made by pharmacy technicians could reduce the time spent by the nurses on administration of medications to the patients.

methodsThis observational study was conducted over a 7 week period in the geriatric ward at Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Two pharmacy technicians conducted medication reconciliation and prescribing reviews at the time of patients' admission to the ward. The reviews were conducted according to standard operating procedures developed by a clinical pharmacist and approved by the Head of the Geriatric Department.

findingsIn total, 629 discrepancies were detected during the conducted medication reconciliations, in average 3 for each patient. About 45% of the prescribing discrepancies were accepted and corrected by the physicians. "Medication omission" was the most frequently detected discrepancy (46% of total). During the prescribing reviews, a total of 860 prescription errors were detected, approximately one per medication review. Almost all of the detected prescription errors were later accepted and/or corrected by the physicians. "Dosage and time interval errors" were the most frequently detected error (48% of total). The time used by nurses for administration of medicines was reduced in the study period.

conclusionThis study suggests that pharmacy technicians can contribute to a substantial reduction in medication discrepancies in acutely admitted patients by performing medication reconciliation and focused medication reviews. Further randomized, controlled studies including a larger number of patients are required to elucidate whether these observations are of significance and of importance for securing patient safety.

Indexed as

Geriatric wardmedication administration timemedication reconciliationmedication reviewpharmacy technicians

Identifiers

PMID24991623
PMCPMC4076929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.