ArticleJournal of research in pharmacy practice2012
Response to thrombolytic agents in acute myocardial infarction in opium abusers versus non-abusers.
Article in Journal of research in pharmacy practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of opium on the cardiovascular system: a review of side effects, uses, and potential mechanisms.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2020Pooled it
- Opium Addiction and Correlation with Early and Six-month Outcomes of Presenting with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated Initially with Thrombolytic Therapy.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCoronary artery disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in populations. In opium abusers, level of circulating coagulation factors differs from non-abusers. The aim of this study was to evaluate response to thrombolytic therapy in opium abusers vs. non-abusers.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, 83 patients (36 opium abusers and 47 non-abusers) with AMI were evaluated for the presence and degree of response to thrombolytic agent. All patients were monitored for electrocardiographic changes and response to thrombolysis 2 hours before and after administration of thrombolytic agent. Serum CPK and LDH were measured 2 hours before and after thrombolysis. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed by independent t-test and chi-square using SPSS, respectively.
findingsST-resolution 2 hours after thrombolysis was 63.8% and 44.4% in opium users and non-users, respectively. Serum level of CPK cardiac biomarker 2 hours after thrombolysis was 980 ± 245 and 847 ± 130 IU/L in opium users and non-users, respectively.
conclusionOur data demonstrate that in those patients with opium abuse, electrocardiographic changes after thrombolysis were significantly lower than opium non-users (P < 0.05). Opium users showed better ST-resolution compared with non-users. Opium addiction had effect on cardiac enzymes despite their effect on response to streptokinase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.