Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24991348›Full record

ArticleAmerican health & drug benefits2013

The economic burden of fragile x syndrome: healthcare resource utilization in the United States.

Patricia Sacco, Gorana Capkun-Niggli, Xin Zhang, Rosemary Jose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American health & drug benefits, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Healthcare and Societal Costs of Familial Intellectual Disability.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reflections on the Importance of Cost of Illness Analysis in Rare Diseases: A Proposal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Fragile X Syndrome-Associated Emergency Department Visits in the United States, 2006-2011.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2020
    Article
  7. Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of a 176-condition expanded carrier screen.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patricia SaccoDirector of Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ.
Gorana Capkun-NiggliDirector of Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Xin ZhangStatistical Analyst, Beijing Novartis Pharma Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Rosemary JoseEvidence Analyst, Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Novartis Healthcare Private Limited, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited form of intellectual disability with cognitive and behavioral impairments, and is associated with a lifetime of care-taking challenges. There is a paucity of data on the economic burden of FXS.

objectiveTo analyze the direct costs associated with healthcare and medication utilization for patients with FXS by using commercial and Medicare/Medicaid administrative claims data.

methodsAll-cause direct healthcare and prescription drug utilization were analyzed from the Thomson Reuters Healthcare MarketScan Commercial, the Medicare Supplemental, and the MarketScan Medicaid databases between 2004 and 2009. Inclusion criteria were ≥1 diagnosis of FXS (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, 759.83) and ≥12 months of continuous enrollment in the current health plan. Emergency department, hospitalization, outpatient visit, nonspecified procedures, and prescription drug data were analyzed for a 12-month follow-up period. Because the number of Medicare patients was <50, commercial and Medicare databases were combined into a single cohort. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results.

resultsA total of 1505 patients were included in the study; of these, 784 patients had commercial/Medicare insurance and 721 patients had Medicaid. The mean age was 18 years. In all age-groups, the median all-cause healthcare cost per patient was significantly lower in the commercial/Medicare cohort (range, $2222-$2955) than in the Medicaid cohort (range, $4548-$9702). The annual median costs per patient for those who had any medical procedures were $1614 and $3064 for commercial or Medicare and for Medicaid, respectively. The annual median costs per patient for those with at least 1 hospitalization was $7740 in the commercial/Medicare cohort (9.4% of patients) and $4468 in the Medicaid cohort (12.5% of patients).

conclusionThis first descriptive US claims analysis supports the overall results from surveys on the economic burden related to FXS. The cost drivers in this population included medical procedures, hospitalizations in a subset of patients, and medications to a lesser extent. This information may be relevant to payers for benefit design and allocation of resources. A more targeted assessment of resource utilization is needed to estimate the value of interventions that reduce costs and improve the outcomes of patients with FXS.

Identifiers

PMID24991348
PMCPMC4031705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.