ArticleShanghai archives of psychiatry2013
Ginkgo biloba extract for dementia: a systematic review.
Article in Shanghai archives of psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The treatment of cognitive dysfunction in dementia: a multiple treatments meta-analysis.Psychopharmacology · 2018Pooled it
- A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Ginkgo Biloba and Caroverine in the Management of Idiopathic Tinnitus.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
- Ginkgo Biloba and Long COVID: In Vivo and In Vitro Models for the Evaluation of Nanotherapeutic Efficacy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Article
- Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Other Lifestyle Factors in the Prevention of Cognitive Decline and Dementia.Nutrients · 2021Review
- An Updated Review of Randomized Clinical Trials Testing the Improvement of Cognitive Function ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2019Review
- Article
- An Overview of Systematic Reviews ofFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2016Review
- Effects of Ginkgo biloba extract on the structure of Cornu Ammonis in aged rat: A morphometric study.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2015Article
- Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of Ginkgo biloba extract for the treatment of dementia.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven the increasing burden of dementia internationally and the lack of effective treatments, several countries are already recommending the use of ginkgo biloba extract (GbE) in the treatment of dementia, despite the inconsistent research results about its effectiveness.
aimConduct a meta-analysis of studies about the effect of GbE on cognition and daily functioning in persons with dementia.
methodsSearches of various English and Chinese databases identified reports of placebo controlled, randomized trials of ginkgo biloba treatment (lasting a minimum of 22 weeks) for dementia that were published from January 1982 to September 2012. Data extraction and critical appraisal of studies were conducted using the GRADE system. Heterogeneity, sensitivity and potential publication bias of the studies were evaluated using RevMan 5.1. Pooled results of the metaanalysis were presented as forest plots using standardized mean differences (SMD) in scores for continuous variables and relative risk (RR) for categorical variables.
resultsNine studies with a total of 2578 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pooled results from the six studies that were included in the meta-analysis (total n=1917) found that GbE was superior to placebo in preventing deterioration in cognitive functioning and in activities of daily living, but these results were only valid for studies with younger subjects (with a mean age below 75). There were no significant differences in the dropout rates between groups or in the overall rates of adverse events during treatment. However, there was considerable heterogeneity in the results between the studies (primarily based on the age of the subjects) and there were several potential biases in the reports (most of which were supported by pharmaceutical firms), so the overall evidence was considered of 'low quality'.
conclusionThis meta-analysis highlights serious weaknesses in the available studies about this important problem. GbE may be effective in persons under 75 years of age with dementia, but large, placebo controlled, randomized trials focused on milder forms of dementia (including mild cognitive impairment) that compare different doses of GbE and that follow subjects for prolonged periods (at least one year) are needed to confirm this result.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.