Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24991041›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2014

Neither folic acid supplementation nor pregnancy affects the distribution of folate forms in the red blood cells of women.

Brenda A Hartman, Zia Fazili, Christine M Pfeiffer, Deborah L O'Connor

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01741077 (The Effect of Folic Acid Supplementation and Pregnancy on the Folate Forms in Red Blood Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01741077 completednot on this map

The Effect of Folic Acid Supplementation and Pregnancy on the Folate Forms in Red Blood Cells

TypeobservationalSponsorThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenRan2008 to 2010Enrolled32ConditionsPregnancyArmsfolic acid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Brenda A HartmanDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada The Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Zia FaziliCDC, Atlanta, GA; and.
Christine M PfeifferCDC, Atlanta, GA; and.
Deborah L O'ConnorDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada The Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada deborah_l.oconnor@sickkids.ca.
CDC Foundation · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is not known whether folate metabolism is altered during pregnancy to support increased DNA and RNA biosynthesis. By using a state-of-the-art LC tandem mass spectrometry technique, the aim of this study was to investigate differences in RBC folate forms between pregnant and nonpregnant women and between nonpregnant women consuming different concentrations of supplemental folic acid. Forms of folate in RBCs were used to explore potential shifts in folate metabolism during early erythropoiesis. Total RBC folate and folate forms [tetrahydrofolate; 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-methyl-THF); 4α-hydroxy-5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate (an oxidation product of 5-methyl-THF); 5-formyl-tetrahydrofolate; and 5,10-methenyl-tetrahydrofolate] were measured in 4 groups of women (n = 26): pregnant women (PW) (30-36 wk of gestation) consuming 1 mg/d of folic acid, and nonpregnant women consuming 0 mg/d (NPW-0), 1 mg/d (NPW-1), and 5 mg/d (NPW-5) folic acid. The mean ± SD RBC folate concentration of the NPW-0 group (890 ± 530 nmol/L) was lower than the NPW-1 (1660 ± 350 nmol/L) and NPW-5 (1980 ± 570 nmol/L) groups as assessed by microbiologic assay (n = 26, P < 0.0022). No difference was found between the NPW-1 and NPW-5 groups. We detected 5-methyl-THF [limit of detection (LOD) = 0.06 nmol/L] in all groups and tetrahydrofolate (LOD = 0.2 nmol/L) in most women regardless of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotype. Most women consuming folic acid supplements had detectable concentrations of 5,10-methenyl-tetrahydrofolate (LOD = 0.31 nmol/L). However, there was no difference in the relative distribution of 5-methyl-THF (83-84%), sum of non-methyl folates (0.6-3%), or individual non-methyl folate forms in RBCs across groups. We conclude that although folic acid supplementation in nonpregnant women increases RBC total folate and the concentration of individual folate forms, it does not alter the relative distribution of folate forms. Similarly, distribution of RBC folate forms did not differ between pregnant and nonpregnant women. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01741077.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesErythrocytesFemaleFolic AcidHumansMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)PregnancyTandem Mass SpectrometryTetrahydrofolatesVitamin B ComplexYoung Adult5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic acid5-methyltetrahydrofolateFolic AcidMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)TetrahydrofolatesVitamin B Complex

Identifiers

PMID24991041
PMCPMC4811356
OpenAlexW2147800784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.