Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24990995›Full record

ReviewJournal of virology2014

How viruses hijack the ERAD tuning machinery.

Julia Noack, Riccardo Bernasconi, Maurizio Molinari

RetractedErratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of virology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Viruses and autophagy: bend, but don't break.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. TRPM7 senses oxidative stress to release ZnProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Reliance ofGenetics · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia NoackInstitute for Research in Biomedicine, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Riccardo BernasconiInstitute for Research in Biomedicine, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Maurizio MolinariInstitute for Research in Biomedicine, Bellinzona, Switzerland Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, School of Life Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland maurizio.molinari@irb.usi.ch.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An essential step during the intracellular life cycle of many positive-strand RNA viruses is the rearrangement of host cell membranes to generate membrane-bound replication platforms. For example, Nidovirales and Flaviviridae subvert the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for their replication. However, the absence of conventional ER and secretory pathway markers in virus-induced ER-derived membranes has for a long time hampered a thorough understanding of their biogenesis. Recent reports highlight the analogies between mouse hepatitis virus-, equine arteritis virus-, and Japanese encephalitis virus-induced replication platforms and ER-associated degradation (ERAD) tuning vesicles (or EDEMosomes) that display nonlipidated LC3 at their cytosolic face and segregate the ERAD factors EDEM1, OS-9, and SEL1L from the ER lumen. In this Gem, we briefly summarize the current knowledge on ERAD tuning pathways and how they might be hijacked for viral genome replication. As ERAD tuning components, such as SEL1L and nonlipidated LC3, appear to contribute to viral infection, these cellular pathways represent novel candidate drug targets to combat positive-strand RNA viruses.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated DegradationVirus Physiological PhenomenaVirus ReplicationAnimalsEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansVirus DiseasesViruses

Identifiers

PMID24990995
PMCPMC4178841
OpenAlexW2114362418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.