Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24990924›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Chronic deep cerebellar stimulation promotes long-term potentiation, microstructural plasticity, and reorganization of perilesional cortical representation in a rodent model.

Jessica Cooperrider, Havan Furmaga, Ela Plow, Hyun-Joo Park, Zhihong Chen, Grahame Kidd, Kenneth B Baker, John T Gale, Andre G Machado

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06669182 (Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Patients With Alzheimer's Disease:A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06669182 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Patients With Alzheimer's Disease:A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorXijing HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, CerebellumArmsIntermittent Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Cerebellar Connectome.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Change in brain molecular landscapes following electrical stimulation of the nucleus accumbens.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cerebellar Functions Beyond Movement and Learning.Annual review of neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica CooperriderCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute and Departments of Neuroscience and.
Havan FurmagaCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute and Departments of Neuroscience and.
Ela PlowCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute and Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7788-7760
Hyun-Joo ParkDepartments of Neuroscience and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8484-7652
Zhihong ChenDepartments of Neuroscience and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7403-7015
Grahame KiddDepartments of Neuroscience and.
Kenneth B BakerDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6735-2911
John T GaleCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute and Departments of Neuroscience and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6159-6835
Andre G MachadoCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute and Departments of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, and machada@ccf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8132-5610
The Neurological Institute · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Dentatothalamocortical electrical stimulation in post-stroke motor recoveryR01HD061363 · NICHD · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI MACHADO, ANDRE GUELMAN · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Brain Stimulation- aided Stroke Rehabilitation: Neural Mechanisms of RecoveryK01HD069504 · NICHD · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI PLOW, ELA B · 2011 to 2015
$531k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD069504NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control over postinjury CNS plasticity is a major frontier of science that, if conquered, would open new avenues for treatment of neurological disorders. Here we investigate the functional, physiological, and structural changes in the cerebral cortex associated with chronic deep brain stimulation of the cerebellar output, a treatment approach that has been shown to improve postischemia motor recovery in a rodent model of cortical infarcts. Long-Evans rats were pretrained on the pasta-matrix retrieval task, followed by induction of focal cortical ischemia and implantation of a macroelectrode in the contralesional lateral cerebellar nucleus. Animals were assigned to one of three treatment groups pseudorandomly to balance severity of poststroke motor deficits: REGULAR stimulation, BURST stimulation, or SHAM. Treatment initiated 2 weeks post surgery and continued for 5 weeks. At the end, animals were randomly selected for perilesional intracortical microstimulation mapping and tissue sampling for Western blot analysis or contributed tissue for 3D electron microscopy. Evidence of enhanced cortical plasticity with therapeutically effective stimulation is shown, marked by greater perilesional reorganization in stimulation- treated animals versus SHAM. BURST stimulation was significantly effective for promoting distal forepaw cortical representation. Stimulation-treated animals showed a twofold increase in synaptic density compared with SHAM. In addition, treated animals demonstrated increased expression of synaptic markers of long-term potentiation and plasticity, including synaptophysin, NMDAR1, CaMKII, and PSD95. These findings provide a critical foundation of how deep cerebellar stimulation may guide plastic reparative reorganization after nonprogressive brain injury and indicate strong translational potential.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationAnimalsAppetitive BehaviorBrain IschemiaBrain MappingCerebellar NucleiCerebral CortexDominance, CerebralElectrodes, ImplantedElectron Microscope TomographyLong-Term PotentiationMaleNerve Tissue ProteinsRandom AllocationRatsRats, Long-EvansNerve Tissue Proteinscerebello-thalamo-corticaldeep brain stimulationfocal lesionplasticityreorganization

Identifiers

PMID24990924
PMCPMC4078081
OpenAlexW2062124861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.