Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24990591›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2015

Bevacizumab-based combination therapy for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs): a systematic review of the literature.

Omar Abdel-Rahman, Mona Fouad

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Immunotherapy in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Where Are We Now?Current treatment options in oncology · 2021
    Review
  6. Medical Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Update in the Therapy of Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors.Current treatment options in oncology · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway and neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs): prognostic and therapeutic considerations.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Omar Abdel-RahmanClinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Lotfy Elsayed Street, 11665, Cairo, Egypt, omar.abdelrhman@med.asu.edu.eg.
Mona Fouad
Ain Shams University · EG

Funding

Understanding Obesity In Relation to the Built EnvironmentP20MD006899 · NIMHD · JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANTOINE-LAVIGNE, DONNA A · 2012 to 2016
$5.3M
NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD006899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) consist of a large heterogeneous group of epithelial tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation that arises in gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic tissues. Advanced GEP-NENs are considered distinct disease entity with limited approved treatment options and poor prognosis. So, we will explore in this systematic review the value of using bevacizumab-based combination in this subset of NENs.

methodsPubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, trip database and Google Scholar were searched using the terms "GEP-NENs" OR "Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors" AND "systemic anticancer therapy" AND "Bevacizumab" and selecting only the English literature. Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival and overall survival (PFS and OS), tumor response and toxicities.

resultsA total of 17 potentially relevant trials were identified, of which eight studies were excluded. Hence, nine trials involving 320 patients were included. Median PFS was reported in eight out of the nine studies ranging from 8.2 to 16.5 months. Median OS was reported in one study, and it was 33.3 months for the whole group. The disease control rate was reported in the seven studies, and it ranged from 80 to 96%. The overall response rate was reported in eight studies, and it ranged from 0 to 64%. Frequently reported grade 3/4 toxicities were gastrointestinal toxicities, mucocutaneous toxicities and hematologic toxicities (particularly leucopenia).

conclusionsThe current evidence from the available clinical trials suggests that bevacizumab in combination with some other anticancer agents (especially mTOR inhibitors and interferons) could be a more effective and tolerable treatment for advanced GEP-NENs in the future. However, such bevacizumab-based combination cannot be recommended outside the setting of clinical trials.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabClinical Trials as TopicHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisStomach NeoplasmsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumab

Identifiers

PMID24990591
PMCPMC11823798
OpenAlexW1983736257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.