Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24990571›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014

Osiris: accessible and reproducible phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses within the Galaxy workflow management system.

Todd H Oakley, Markos A Alexandrou, Roger Ngo, M Sabrina Pankey, Celia K C Churchill, William Chen, Karl B Lopker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The highest-elevation frog provides insights into mechanisms and evolution of defenses against high UV radiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Primer on Infectious Disease Bacterial Genomics.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Todd H OakleyEcology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. oakley@lifesci.ucsb.edu.
Markos A Alexandrou
Roger Ngo
M Sabrina Pankey
Celia K C Churchill
William Chen
Karl B Lopker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhylogenetic tools and 'tree-thinking' approaches increasingly permeate all biological research. At the same time, phylogenetic data sets are expanding at breakneck pace, facilitated by increasingly economical sequencing technologies. Therefore, there is an urgent need for accessible, modular, and sharable tools for phylogenetic analysis.

resultsWe developed a suite of wrappers for new and existing phylogenetics tools for the Galaxy workflow management system that we call Osiris. Osiris and Galaxy provide a sharable, standardized, modular user interface, and the ability to easily create complex workflows using a graphical interface. Osiris enables all aspects of phylogenetic analysis within Galaxy, including de novo assembly of high throughput sequencing reads, ortholog identification, multiple sequence alignment, concatenation, phylogenetic tree estimation, and post-tree comparative analysis. The open source files are available on in the Bitbucket public repository and many of the tools are demonstrated on a public web server (http://galaxy-dev.cnsi.ucsb.edu/osiris/).

conclusionsOsiris can serve as a foundation for other phylogenomic and phylogenetic tool development within the Galaxy platform.

Indexed as

PhylogenySoftwareComputational BiologySequence AlignmentUser-Computer InterfaceWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID24990571
PMCPMC4227113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.