Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24990523›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2014

Going viral with cancer immunotherapy.

Brian D Lichty, Caroline J Breitbach, David F Stojdl, John C Bell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03792724 (Phase I-II Study of Intratumoral Urelumab Combined With Nivolumab in Patients With Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 365 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
365citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
48.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03792724 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Phase I-II Study of Intratumoral Urelumab Combined With Nivolumab in Patients With Solid Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de NavarraRan2019 to 2023Enrolled32ConditionsNeoplasmsArmsUrelumab + Nivolumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

365 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 580 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical Application of Oncolytic Viruses: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The emerging role of oncolytic virotherapy in genitourinary malignancies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  20. Identification of TPRA1 as a Novel Receptor and Predictive Biomarker for Oncolytic Virus M1.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article

305 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian D LichtyDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S4K1, Canada.
Caroline J BreitbachSillaJen Biotherapeutics, San Francisco, California 94111, USA.
David F StojdlApoptosis Research Centre, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada.
John C BellCentre for Innovative Cancer Therapeutics, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada; and the Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · CAMcMaster University · CAOttawa Hospital · CASillaJen (United States) · US

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent clinical data have emphatically shown the capacity of our immune systems to eradicate even advanced cancers. Although oncolytic viruses (OVs) were originally designed to function as tumour-lysing therapeutics, they have now been clinically shown to initiate systemic antitumour immune responses. Cell signalling pathways that are activated and promote the growth of tumour cells also favour the growth and replication of viruses within the cancer. The ability to engineer OVs that express immune-stimulating 'cargo', the induction of immunogenic tumour cell death by OVs and the selective targeting of OVs to tumour beds suggests that they are the ideal reagents to enhance antitumour immune responses. Coupling of OV therapy with tumour antigen vaccination, immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cell therapy seems to be ready to converge towards a new generation of multimodal therapeutics to improve outcomes for cancer patients.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyOncolytic VirotherapyAnimalsCancer VaccinesGenetic VectorsHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsOncolytic VirusesCancer VaccinesImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID24990523
OpenAlexW2011513757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.