Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24990494›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2015

Assessing fluid balance in critically ill pediatric patients.

Thomas Bontant, Boris Matrot, Hendy Abdoul, Sophie Aizenfisz, Jérôme Naudin, Peter Jones, Stéphane Dauger

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04151160 (Using Point of Care Ultrasound to Measure Perioperative Edema in Infants With Congenital Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04151160 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Using Point of Care Ultrasound to Measure Perioperative Edema in Infants With Congenital Heart Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2020 to 2021Enrolled72ConditionsCongenital Heart Disease, Edema, Fluid OverloadArmsPoint of care ultrasound measurements
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Precision of weight measurement in critically ill infants: a technical report.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Fluid Overload in Critically Ill Children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas BontantPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Assistance- Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Robert Debre University Hospital, 48 boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France.
Boris Matrot
Hendy Abdoul
Sophie Aizenfisz
Jérôme Naudin
Peter Jones
Stéphane Dauger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledMonitoring fluid balance (FB) in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is crucial to assess fluid overload. Pediatric intensivists (PI) frequently use the fluid intake minus output (FIMO) or FIMO with adjustments for insensible fluid loss (AFIMO). However, the accuracy of FIMO/AFIMO has never been tested in critically ill children. We designed a prospective, monocentric cohort study in a PICU of a university hospital. Body weight (BW) was measured in all children consecutively admitted to PICU and 24 h later. Every 12 h, the nurses calculated FIMO/AFIMO. Time burden and convenience of each procedure (median; [interquartile range]) were recorded and compared using a Wilcoxon test. Data were analysed using linear regression (r (2) coefficient) and the Bland-Altman plot (mean difference ± standard deviation; absolute mean difference), with a 300-ml variation of FB considered clinically relevant. Sixty consecutive patients, 304-day [39-1,565] old with admission weight of 9.2 kg [4.4-17.8] were included. Although correlations between FIMO/AFIMO and BW changes (BWC) were strong (r (2) FIMO = 0.63, p < 0.0001 and r (2) AFIMO = 0.72, p < 0.0001, respectively), agreement between FIMO/AFIMO and BWC were over 300 mL (-0.305 ± 0.451, 0.382 L and -0.007 ± 0.447, 0.302 L, respectively). No significant differences were noted between FIMO/AFIMO and BWC measurements for time burden (5 min [5-10] vs. 5 min [5-10], p = 0.84) or convenience (1 min [1-2] vs. 1 min [0-1.3], p = 0.13).

conclusionBecause agreement between FIMO/AFIMO and BWC is poor during the first 24 h after admission into PICU, PIs may reserve FIMO/AFIMO to monitor FB in patients with absolute contraindications of BW measurements.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessWater-Electrolyte BalanceChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.