ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014
Impact of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT on the management of adrenocortical carcinoma: analysis of 106 patients.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- 18F-CETO in adrenocortical carcinoma: first clinical-translational study of an adrenocortical-targeting PET tracer.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026Article
- Prognostic role of pretreatment [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Analysis of clinical and pathological characteristics of classic adrenocortical carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prognostic role of quantitative [18F]FDG PET/CT parameters in adrenocortical carcinoma.Endocrine · 2024Article
- Review of Diagnostic Modalities for Adrenal Incidentaloma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- ProminentAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2023Article
- Adrenal Lesions: A Review of Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Clinical utility of nuclear imaging in the evaluation of pediatric adrenal neoplasms.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Review
- Surgical Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Current Highlights.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Adrenocortical carcinoma: current state of the art, ongoing controversies, and future directions in diagnosis and treatment.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2021Review
- American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Disease State Clinical Review on the Evaluation and Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma in an Adult: a Practical Approach.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2020Review
- Immunohistochemical Analysis of the Metabolic Phenotype of Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma.Endocrine pathology · 2020Article
- The Spectrum of Large Adrenal Masses: A Case Series.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2020Article
- Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma: a Single Institutional Experience.Hormones & cancer · 2019Article
- GLUT1 expression in pediatric adrenocortical tumors: a promising candidate to predict clinical behavior.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Assessment of tumor heterogeneity in treatment-naïve adrenocortical cancer patients using (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography.Endocrine · 2016Article
- Update on advances in molecular PET in urological oncology.Japanese journal of radiology · 2016Review
- 5th International ACC Symposium: Imaging for Diagnosis and Surveillance of Adrenal Tumors--New Advances and Reviews of Old Concepts.Hormones & cancer · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAdrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy. Limited data are available about on value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in ACC. We evaluated the impact of PET/CT on the management of ACC.
methodsWe performed a retrospective review in patients with ACC who had undergone PET/CT. The impact of PET/CT on the management plan was evaluated by comparing the findings on PET/CT to the findings on contrast-enhanced CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each form of imaging were calculated. The correlations between PET/CT parameters, including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), total lesion glycolysis, and decline in SUVmax after chemotherapy, and clinical outcome were evaluated.
resultsIncluded in the analysis were 106 patients with 180 PET/CT scans. Of the 106 patients, 7 underwent PET/CT only for initial staging, 84 underwent PET/CT only for restaging, and 15 underwent PET/CT for both initial staging and restaging. PET/CT changed the management plan in 1 of 22 patients (5%) at initial staging and 9 of 99 patients (9%) at restaging. In 5 of the patients in whom PET/CT changed the management plan, PET/CT showed response to chemotherapy but contrast-enhanced CT showed stable disease. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100%, 100%, and 100% for PET/CT at initial staging; 92.6%, 100%, and 96.4% for CT at initial staging; 98.4%, 100%, and 99.5% for PET/CT at restaging; and 96.8%, 98.6%, and 98.0% for CT at restaging, respectively. No PET/CT parameters were associated with survival at either initial diagnosis or recurrence.
conclusionPET/CT findings could substantially change the management plan in a small proportion of patients with ACC. Although lesion detection was similar between PET/CT and CT, PET/CT may be preferred for chemotherapeutic response assessment because it may predict response before anatomic changes are detected on CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24990404What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.