Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24990371›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2014

Integration of mapped RNA-Seq reads into automatic training of eukaryotic gene finding algorithm.

Alexandre Lomsadze, Paul D Burns, Mark Borodovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 366 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
366citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

366 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Draft genome sequence of the almond red leaf blotch pathogenMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  13. First Genome Assembly of the Critically Endangered Arabian Leopard (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Annotation of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

306 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandre LomsadzeJoint Georgia Tech and Emory Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, GA, USA 30332.
Paul D BurnsJoint Georgia Tech and Emory Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, GA, USA 30332.
Mark BorodovskyJoint Georgia Tech and Emory Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, GA, USA 30332 School of Computational Science and Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, USA 30332 Department of Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia 141700 borodovsky@gatech.edu.

Funding

PREDICTION OF GENE LOCATIONS USING STOCHASTIC MODELSR01HG000783 · NHGRI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BORODOVSKY, MARK · 1993 to 2014
$4.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG000783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a new approach to automatic training of a eukaryotic ab initio gene finding algorithm. With the advent of Next-Generation Sequencing, automatic training has become paramount, allowing genome annotation pipelines to keep pace with the speed of genome sequencing. Earlier we developed GeneMark-ES, currently the only gene finding algorithm for eukaryotic genomes that performs automatic training in unsupervised ab initio mode. The new algorithm, GeneMark-ET augments GeneMark-ES with a novel method that integrates RNA-Seq read alignments into the self-training procedure. Use of 'assembled' RNA-Seq transcripts is far from trivial; significant error rate of assembly was revealed in recent assessments. We demonstrated in computational experiments that the proposed method of incorporation of 'unassembled' RNA-Seq reads improves the accuracy of gene prediction; particularly, for the 1.3 GB genome of Aedes aegypti the mean value of prediction Sensitivity and Specificity at the gene level increased over GeneMark-ES by 24.5%. In the current surge of genomic data when the need for accurate sequence annotation is higher than ever, GeneMark-ET will be a valuable addition to the narrow arsenal of automatic gene prediction tools.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenesAnimalsCulicidaeDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression ProfilingGenes, InsectHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID24990371
PMCPMC4150757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.