Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24990346›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2014

Test-retest reproducibility analysis of lung CT image features.

Yoganand Balagurunathan, Virendra Kumar, Yuhua Gu, Jongphil Kim, Hua Wang, Ying Liu, Dmitry B Goldgof, Lawrence O Hall, Rene Korn, Binsheng Zhao and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 264 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Stability of dynamic radiomics features in cardiac MRI under noise.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The study of dual-phaseScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yoganand BalagurunathanDepartment of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Virendra Kumar
Yuhua Gu
Jongphil Kim
Hua Wang
Ying Liu
Dmitry B Goldgof
Lawrence O Hall
Rene Korn
Binsheng Zhao
Lawrence H Schwartz
Satrajit Basu
Steven Eschrich
Robert A Gatenby
Robert J Gillies
Moffitt Cancer Center · USUniversity of South Florida · USColumbia University · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Radiomics of NSCLCU01CA143062 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GILLIES, ROBERT J., SCHABATH, MATTHEW B. · 2010 to 2020
$5.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS U01 CA143062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative size, shape, and texture features derived from computed tomographic (CT) images may be useful as predictive, prognostic, or response biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, to be useful, such features must be reproducible, non-redundant, and have a large dynamic range. We developed a set of quantitative three-dimensional (3D) features to describe segmented tumors and evaluated their reproducibility to select features with high potential to have prognostic utility. Thirty-two patients with NSCLC were subjected to unenhanced thoracic CT scans acquired within 15 min of each other under an approved protocol. Primary lung cancer lesions were segmented using semi-automatic 3D region growing algorithms. Following segmentation, 219 quantitative 3D features were extracted from each lesion, corresponding to size, shape, and texture, including features in transformed spaces (laws, wavelets). The most informative features were selected using the concordance correlation coefficient across test-retest, the biological range and a feature independence measure. There were 66 (30.14%) features with concordance correlation coefficient ≥ 0.90 across test-retest and acceptable dynamic range. Of these, 42 features were non-redundant after grouping features with R (2) Bet ≥ 0.95. These reproducible features were found to be predictive of radiological prognosis. The area under the curve (AUC) was 91% for a size-based feature and 92% for the texture features (runlength, laws). We tested the ability of image features to predict a radiological prognostic score on an independent NSCLC (39 adenocarcinoma) samples, the AUC for texture features (runlength emphasis, energy) was 0.84 while the conventional size-based features (volume, longest diameter) was 0.80. Test-retest and correlation analyses have identified non-redundant CT image features with both high intra-patient reproducibility and inter-patient biological range. Thus making the case that quantitative image features are informative and prognostic biomarkers for NSCLC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsArea Under CurveFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID24990346
PMCPMC4391075
OpenAlexW2061077502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.