Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24990200›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of impotence research

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 5-mg once-daily versus 5-mg alternate-day tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms.

H Choi, J-H Kim, J-S Shim, J Y Park, S H Kang, D G Moon, J Cheon, J G Lee, J J Kim, J-H Bae

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of impotence research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H ChoiDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J-H KimDepartment of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J-S ShimDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Y ParkDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
S H KangDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
D G MoonDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J CheonDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J G LeeDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J J KimDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J-H BaeDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Korea University · KRSoonchunhyang University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the effects of 5-mg once-daily tadalafil versus 5-mg alternate-day tadalafil in men with moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Between January 2012 and June 2013, 144 men presenting with an International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score of <18 and an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of >8 were enrolled to the study. Patients were allocated the simple alternate randomization into Group I (5-mg once-daily tadalafil) and Group II (5-mg alternate-day tadalafil). Changes in IIEF scores, Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3 (SEP Q3) percentage, IPSS, uroflowmetry and post void residual at the first visit (V1), week 4 (V2) and week 12 (V3) were compared. No significant difference was found between the baseline patient characteristics of Group I and Group II. Treatment with 5-mg daily tadalafil demonstrated improvement in IIEF, SEP Q3 percentage and IPSS score between V1 and V2, and that between V1 and V3. Patients receiving 5-mg alternate-day tadalafil also showed a significant improvement in IIEF, SEP Q3 percentage, and IPSS score between V1 and V2, and that between V2 and V3. However, no significant improvements were found in any other parameters. There were no significant differences between Group I and Group II apart from IIEF scores in V2 (19.4 versus 17.9, respectively). The SEP Q3 percentage was also higher at the V2 visit for Group I and Group II (35.6 versus 30.9%). Even with no placebo control and short of LUTS medication control, the use of 5-mg once-daily or alternate-day treatment with tadalafil was well tolerated in patients and effectively improved the IIEF score, IPSS score and SEP Q3 percentage. Management of patients with 5-mg alternate-day tadalafil could be adequate for regular use in patients with ED and LUTS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarbolinesErectile DysfunctionHumansLower Urinary Tract SymptomsMaleMiddle AgedPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsProspective StudiesTadalafilCarbolinesPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsTadalafil

Identifiers

PMID24990200
OpenAlexW2071773763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.