Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24990037›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2014

The use of theranostic gadolinium-based nanoprobes to improve radiotherapy efficacy.

L Sancey, F Lux, S Kotb, S Roux, S Dufort, A Bianchi, Y Crémillieux, P Fries, J-L Coll, C Rodriguez-Lafrasse and 19 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Precision Oncology: Advances in Drug Delivery and Imaging.Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

L Sancey1 Institut Lumière Matière, UMR5306 Université Lyon 1-CNRS, Team FENNEC, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
F Lux
S Kotb
S Roux
S Dufort
A Bianchi
Y Crémillieux
P Fries
J-L Coll
C Rodriguez-Lafrasse
M Janier
M Dutreix
M Barberi-Heyob
F Boschetti
F Denat
C Louis
E Porcel
S Lacombe
G Le Duc
E Deutsch
J-L Perfettini
A Detappe
C Verry
R Berbeco
K T Butterworth
S J McMahon
K M Prise
P Perriat
O Tillement
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FRQueen's University Belfast · GBDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USInserm · FREuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility · FRInstitut Curie · FRInstitut Mérieux (France) · FRMaison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités de Dijon · FRSociety of Interventional Radiology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new efficient type of gadolinium-based theranostic agent (AGuIX®) has recently been developed for MRI-guided radiotherapy (RT). These new particles consist of a polysiloxane network surrounded by a number of gadolinium chelates, usually 10. Owing to their small size (<5 nm), AGuIX typically exhibit biodistributions that are almost ideal for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. For example, although a significant proportion of these particles accumulate in tumours, the remainder is rapidly eliminated by the renal route. In addition, in the absence of irradiation, the nanoparticles are well tolerated even at very high dose (10 times more than the dose used for mouse treatment). AGuIX particles have been proven to act as efficient radiosensitizers in a large variety of experimental in vitro scenarios, including different radioresistant cell lines, irradiation energies and radiation sources (sensitizing enhancement ratio ranging from 1.1 to 2.5). Pre-clinical studies have also demonstrated the impact of these particles on different heterotopic and orthotopic tumours, with both intratumoural or intravenous injection routes. A significant therapeutical effect has been observed in all contexts. Furthermore, MRI monitoring was proven to efficiently aid in determining a RT protocol and assessing tumour evolution following treatment. The usual theoretical models, based on energy attenuation and macroscopic dose enhancement, cannot account for all the results that have been obtained. Only theoretical models, which take into account the Auger electron cascades that occur between the different atoms constituting the particle and the related high radical concentrations in the vicinity of the particle, provide an explanation for the complex cell damage and death observed.

Indexed as

GadoliniumNanoparticlesRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsAnimalsContrast MediaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceModels, TheoreticalNeoplasmsSiloxanesContrast MediaGadoliniumRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsSiloxanes

Identifiers

PMID24990037
PMCPMC4453146
OpenAlexW2096456517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.