Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24989933›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2015

Comparing complications of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of the randomized and non-randomized controlled studies.

Haixiang Xiao, Jiandong Yang, Xinming Feng, Pengtao Chen, Yinan Li, Cheng Huang, Yuan Liang, Hongzhou Chen

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exploration of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture as day surgery: a retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. [Hybrid stabilization and geriatric complex treatment of type A spinal fractures].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The best cited articles of the European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST): a bibliometric analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation in fragility fractures-indications and limitations.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haixiang XiaoMedical School of Yangzhou University, 11 N. Huaihai Street, Yangzhou, 225001, China, 604740702@qq.com.
Jiandong Yang
Xinming Feng
Pengtao Chen
Yinan Li
Cheng Huang
Yuan Liang
Hongzhou Chen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare complications of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

backgroundPVP and BKP are two minimally invasive procedures for treating OVCFs, while few studies emphases attention to intra- and post-operative complications about the two procedures.

methodsOnline databases were searched for studies comparing complications of PVP and BKP for OVCFs, the randomized controlled trials, clinical controlled trials and cohort studies that provided related data were identified. Demographic characteristics and complications related to procedures were extracted and analysed from all of the included studies.

resultsNineteen studies encompassing 1,787 patients in total, of whom 887 received PVP and 900 received BKP, met the inclusion criteria. For subsequent fractures, our meta-analysis detected no significant difference between the two procedures, both for adjacent fractures (p = 0.29) and non-adjacent fractures (p = 0.37). For cement extravasations, there was no significant difference between the two interventions if considering disc spaces extravasations only (p = 0.24), while considering total extravasations and paravertebral extravasations, the cement leakage rate in the PVP group was significantly higher than the BKP group (total: p < 0.01; paravertebral: p < 0.01).

conclusionsThe two procedures suffer from equal risk of subsequent spinal fractures; PVP has a significant higher cement leakage rate compared to BKP, mainly caused by a higher paravertebral leakage, patients with extremely poor pulmonary function or unstable haemodynamic are better candidates for BKP.

Indexed as

Bone CementsExtravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic MaterialsFractures, CompressionFractures, SpontaneousHumansKyphoplastyNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicOsteoporosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceSpinal FracturesVertebroplastyBone Cements

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.