ReviewDrugs & aging2014
Rivastigmine transdermal patch 13.3 mg/24 h: a review of its use in the management of mild to moderate Alzheimer's dementia.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug delivery strategies with lipid-based nanoparticles for Alzheimer's disease treatment.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- [Dementia with Lewy bodies: old and new knowledge-Part 2: treatment].Der Nervenarzt · 2024Review
- Comparative safety and effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for Alzheimer's disease: a network meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2018Article
- Rivastigmine for Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rivastigmine is unique among cholinesterase inhibitors commonly used in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) in that it is available as a transdermal patch formulation (Exelon(®) patch, Rivastach(®) patch, Prometax(®) patch). The patch is applied once daily and, in the EU (and US), is available in three sizes: 5, 10 and 15 cm(2) (releasing 4.6, 9.5 and 13.3 mg rivastigmine/24 h, respectively). In the phase III OPTIMA trial, patients with mild to moderate AD who experienced functional and cognitive decline on the 10 cm(2) patch-the recommended maintenance dose-gained additional benefit when their dose was increased to the 15 cm(2) patch. For example, 15 cm(2) patch recipients showed significantly less functional and cognitive decline than 10 cm(2) patch recipients after 24 weeks of double-blind treatment. Patients receiving the 15 cm(2) patch also showed significantly less functional, but not cognitive, decline than those receiving the 10 cm(2) patch after 48 weeks of double-blind treatment; as such, OPTIMA only met one of its two co-primary endpoints. The 15 cm(2) patch was generally well tolerated; although more 15 cm(2) than 10 cm(2) patch recipients reported adverse events (e.g. nausea and vomiting), fewer 15 cm(2) than 10 cm(2) patch recipients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. By further slowing functional deterioration without markedly compromising tolerability, increasing the transdermal rivastigmine dose to the 15 cm(2) patch has a favourable benefit-risk profile-and therefore represents a valid option-in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate AD who have previously experienced functional and cognitive decline while receiving the 10 cm(2) patch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24989628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.