ArticleLasers in medical science2015
Laser-assisted hatching of cleavage-stage embryos impairs developmental potential and increases DNA damage in blastocysts.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Laser-Assisted Hatching on Cognitive and Metabolic Development of Singletons Conceived Through Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer: A Matched Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Article
- Non-Assisted Hatching Trophectoderm Biopsy Does Not Increase The Risks of Most Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcome and May Be More Practical for Busy Clinics: Evidence From China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- The Effect of Assisted Hatching on Live Birth Rate Following Fresh Embryo Transfer in Advanced Maternal Age.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2019Article
- Epigenetic changes in preimplantation embryos subjected to laser manipulation.Lasers in medical science · 2017Article
- The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.Molecular human reproduction · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the influence of two- (day 2) and six-to-eight-cell-stage (day 3) laser-assisted hatchings on the developmental potential and genetic integrity of the embryos. In this prospective experimental study, two- and six-to-eight-cell-stage mouse embryos were subjected to laser hatching using 1,480 nm diode laser, and then assessed for the developmental potential and DNA integrity in blastocysts. Similarly, four-cell-stage human embryos from 20 patients were also subjected to laser hatching, and then assessed for the developmental competence. Laser-assisted hatching in mouse embryos significantly enhanced the blastocyst hatching potential on day 4.5 (P < 0.0001). However, a significant decline in blastocyst total cell number (TCN) was observed in six-to-eight-cell-stage laser-hatched embryos (P < 0.001). Conversely, no significant difference in TCN was observed between laser-hatched and unhatched human four-cell-stage embryos after 24 h. Attempt to understand the genetic integrity in laser-hatched mouse blastocysts revealed significantly higher labeling index when hatching was done at two- (P < 0.01) and six-to-eight-cell stage (P < 0.05). DNA damage induced by the laser manipulation may affect implantation and postimplantation developmental potential of the embryos. However, further studies are required to elucidate the impact of laser-induced DNA damage on the reproductive outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.