Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24988520›Full record

ReviewViruses2014

Facing antibiotic resistance: Staphylococcus aureus phages as a medical tool.

Zuzanna Kaźmierczak, Andrzej Górski, Krystyna Dąbrowska

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Antibiotic Resistance ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Guidelines to Compose an Ideal Bacteriophage Cocktail.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. εPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. The Type II Secretory System Mediates Phage Infection inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. JD419, aFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zuzanna KaźmierczakInstitute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. R. Weigla 12, Wroclaw 53-114, Poland. zuzanna.kazmierczak@iitd.pan.wroc.pl.
Andrzej GórskiInstitute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. R. Weigla 12, Wroclaw 53-114, Poland. gorski@iitd.pan.wroc.pl.
Krystyna DąbrowskaInstitute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. R. Weigla 12, Wroclaw 53-114, Poland. dabrok@iitd.pan.wroc.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a common and often virulent pathogen in humans. This bacterium is widespread, being present on the skin and in the nose of healthy people. Staphylococcus aureus can cause infections with severe outcomes ranging from pustules to sepsis and death. The introduction of antibiotics led to a general belief that the problem of bacterial infections would be solved. Nonetheless, pathogens including staphylococci have evolved mechanisms of drug resistance. Among current attempts to address this problem, phage therapy offers a promising alternative to combat staphylococcal infections. Here, we present an overview of current knowledge on staphylococcal infections and bacteriophages able to kill Staphylococcus, including experimental studies and available data on their clinical use.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsComplementary TherapiesDisease Models, AnimalDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansLysogenyStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus PhagesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID24988520
PMCPMC4113783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.