ArticlePloS one2014
DNA barcoding works in practice but not in (neutral) theory.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conservation Mitonuclear Replacement: Facilitated mitochondrial adaptation for a changing world.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- A Measure of the DNA Barcode Gap for Applied and Basic Research.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Examination of sequence variations in partial mitochondrial 12S gene amongst damselfish species as references for DNA barcoding.Biodiversity data journal · 2024Article
- Article
- PyKleeBarcode: Enabling representation of the whole animal kingdom in information space.PloS one · 2023Article
- An electrochemical biosensor for the rapid genetic identification of Musang King durian.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Integration of advanced technologies for plant variety and cultivar identification.Journal of biosciences · 2021Review
- Genetic hitchhiking, mitonuclear coadaptation, and the origins of mt DNA barcode gaps.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Can Mitogenomes of the Northern Wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe) Reconstruct Its Phylogeography and Reveal the Origin of Migrant Birds?Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Assessing insect biodiversity with automatic light traps in Brazil: Pearls and pitfalls of metabarcoding samples in preservative ethanol.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Rejection of the genetic implications of the "Abundant Centre Hypothesis" in marine mussels.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Intraspecific mitochondrial gene variation can be as low as that of nuclear rRNA.F1000Research · 2020Article
- Incomplete estimates of genetic diversity within species: Implications for DNA barcoding.Ecology and evolution · 2019Review
- Mitochondrial DNA is unsuitable to test for isolation by distance.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- The first initiative of DNA barcoding of ornamental plants from Egypt and potential applications in horticulture industry.PloS one · 2017Article
- Bridging two scholarly islands enriches both: COI DNA barcodes for species identification versus human mitochondrial variation for the study of migrations and pathologies.Ecology and evolution · 2016Article
- Mitonuclear coevolution as the genesis of speciation and the mitochondrial DNA barcode gap.Ecology and evolution · 2016Article
- Toward a microbial Neolithic revolution in buildings.Microbiome · 2016Review
- One fungus, which genes? Development and assessment of universal primers for potential secondary fungal DNA barcodes.Persoonia · 2015Article
- Mitonuclear Ecology.Molecular biology and evolution · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA barcode differences within animal species are usually much less than differences among species, making it generally straightforward to match unknowns to a reference library. Here we aim to better understand the evolutionary mechanisms underlying this usual "barcode gap" pattern. We employ avian barcode libraries to test a central prediction of neutral theory, namely, intraspecific variation equals 2 Nµ, where N is population size and µ is mutations per site per generation. Birds are uniquely suited for this task: they have the best-known species limits, are well represented in barcode libraries, and, most critically, are the only large group with documented census population sizes. In addition, we ask if mitochondrial molecular clock measurements conform to neutral theory prediction of clock rate equals µ.
resultsIntraspecific COI barcode variation was uniformly low regardless of census population size (n = 142 species in 15 families). Apparent outliers reflected lumping of reproductively isolated populations or hybrid lineages. Re-analysis of a published survey of cytochrome b variation in diverse birds (n = 93 species in 39 families) further confirmed uniformly low intraspecific variation. Hybridization/gene flow among species/populations was the main limitation to DNA barcode identification. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: To our knowledge, this is the first large study of animal mitochondrial diversity using actual census population sizes and the first to test outliers for population structure. Our finding of universally low intraspecific variation contradicts a central prediction of neutral theory and is not readily accounted for by commonly proposed ad hoc modifications. We argue that the weight of evidence-low intraspecific variation and the molecular clock-indicates neutral evolution plays a minor role in mitochondrial sequence evolution. As an alternate paradigm consistent with empirical data, we propose extreme purifying selection, including at synonymous sites, limits variation within species and continuous adaptive selection drives the molecular clock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.