Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24988339›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

Protrusion fluctuations direct cell motion.

David Caballero, Raphaël Voituriez, Daniel Riveline

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Guiding of Cell Migration over Sloped Steps Using TiOJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mesenchymal cell migration on one-dimensional micropatterns.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  7. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Activates Human Lung Macrophages.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David CaballeroLaboratory of Cell Physics, Institut de Science et d'Ingénierie Supramoléculaires/Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7006, Strasbourg, France; Development and Stem Cells Program, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7104, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (U964),Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France.
Raphaël VoituriezLaboratoire de Physique Théorique de la Matière Condensée, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7600; Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 823, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Daniel RivelineLaboratory of Cell Physics, Institut de Science et d'Ingénierie Supramoléculaires/Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7006, Strasbourg, France; Development and Stem Cells Program, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7104, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (U964),Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France. Electronic address: riveline@unistra.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many physiological phenomena involve directional cell migration. It is usually attributed to chemical gradients in vivo. Recently, other cues have been shown to guide cells in vitro, including stiffness/adhesion gradients or micropatterned adhesive motifs. However, the cellular mechanism leading to these biased migrations remains unknown, and, often, even the direction of motion is unpredictable. In this study, we show the key role of fluctuating protrusions on ratchet-like structures in driving NIH3T3 cell migration. We identified the concept of efficient protrusion and an associated direction index. Our analysis of the protrusion statistics facilitated the quantitative prediction of cell trajectories in all investigated conditions. We varied the external cues by changing the adhesive patterns. We also modified the internal cues using drug treatments, which modified the protrusion activity. Stochasticity affects the short- and long-term steps. We developed a theoretical model showing that an asymmetry in the protrusion fluctuations is sufficient for predicting all measures associated with the long-term motion, which can be described as a biased persistent random walk.

Indexed as

Cell MovementModels, BiologicalAnimalsCell AdhesionCell Surface ExtensionsMiceNIH 3T3 CellsStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID24988339
PMCPMC4119278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.