Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24988196›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Stochastic blockmodeling of the modules and core of the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome.

Dragana M Pavlovic, Petra E Vértes, Edward T Bullmore, William R Schafer, Thomas E Nichols

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. On collective behavior inFrontiers in neurorobotics · 2025
    Review
  4. Hierarchical communities in the larvalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. A generative model of the connectome with dynamic axon growth.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. A generative model of the connectome with dynamic axon growth.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The synaptic organization in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Circuit analysis of theNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  12. The brainstem connectome database.Scientific data · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dragana M PavlovicDepartment of Statistics and Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Petra E VértesBrain Mapping Unit, Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Edward T BullmoreBrain Mapping Unit, Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline, Clinical Unit Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
William R SchaferMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology Division, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Thomas E NicholsDepartment of Statistics and Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Medical Research Council G0001354Medical Research Council G1000183Medical Research Council MC_U105185857Medical Research Council MR/K020706/1NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657NIMH NIH HHS U54MH091657-03Wellcome Trust 100309Wellcome Trust 103784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, there has been much interest in the community structure or mesoscale organization of complex networks. This structure is characterised either as a set of sparsely inter-connected modules or as a highly connected core with a sparsely connected periphery. However, it is often difficult to disambiguate these two types of mesoscale structure or, indeed, to summarise the full network in terms of the relationships between its mesoscale constituents. Here, we estimate a community structure with a stochastic blockmodel approach, the Erdős-Rényi Mixture Model, and compare it to the much more widely used deterministic methods, such as the Louvain and Spectral algorithms. We used the Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) nervous system (connectome) as a model system in which biological knowledge about each node or neuron can be used to validate the functional relevance of the communities obtained. The deterministic algorithms derived communities with 4-5 modules, defined by sparse inter-connectivity between all modules. In contrast, the stochastic Erdős-Rényi Mixture Model estimated a community with 9 blocks or groups which comprised a similar set of modules but also included a clearly defined core, made of 2 small groups. We show that the "core-in-modules" decomposition of the worm brain network, estimated by the Erdős-Rényi Mixture Model, is more compatible with prior biological knowledge about the C. elegans nervous system than the purely modular decomposition defined deterministically. We also show that the blockmodel can be used both to generate stochastic realisations (simulations) of the biological connectome, and to compress network into a small number of super-nodes and their connectivity. We expect that the Erdős-Rényi Mixture Model may be useful for investigating the complex community structures in other (nervous) systems.

Indexed as

ConnectomeModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansNerve NetNeuronsStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID24988196
PMCPMC4079667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.