Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24987984›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Quantification of cell-free DNA in normal and complicated pregnancies: overcoming biological and technical issues.

Irina Manokhina, Tanjot K Singh, Maria S Peñaherrera, Wendy P Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. DNA Diagnostics for Schistosomiasis Control.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Cell-free fetal DNA and spontaneous preterm birth.Reproduction (Cambridge, England) · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advances in the Diagnosis of Human Schistosomiasis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irina ManokhinaDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Child & Family Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tanjot K SinghDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Child & Family Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Maria S PeñaherreraDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Child & Family Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Wendy P RobinsonDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Child & Family Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 257450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characterization of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) originating from placental trophoblast in maternal plasma provides a powerful tool for non-invasive diagnosis of fetal and obstetrical complications. Due to its placental origin, the specific epigenetic features of this DNA (commonly known as cell-free fetal DNA) can be utilized in creating universal 'fetal' markers in maternal plasma, thus overcoming the limitations of gender- or rhesus-specific ones. The goal of this study was to compare the performance of relevant approaches and assays evaluating the amount of cfDNA in maternal plasma throughout gestation (7.2-39.5 weeks). Two fetal- or placental-specific duplex assays (RPP30/SRY and RASSF1A/β-Actin) were applied using two technologies, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Both methods revealed similar performance parameters within the studied dynamic range. Data obtained using qPCR and ddPCR for these assays were positively correlated (total cfDNA (RPP30): R = 0.57, p = 0.001/placental cfDNA (SRY): R = 0.85, p<0.0001; placental cfDNA (RASSF1A): R = 0.75, p<0.0001). There was a significant correlation in SRY and RASSF1A results measured with qPCR (R = 0.68, p = 0.013) and ddPCR (R = 0.56, p = 0.039). Different approaches also gave comparable results with regard to the correlation of the placental cfDNA concentration with gestational age and pathological outcome. We conclude that ddPCR is a practical approach, adaptable to existing qPCR assays and well suited for analysis of cell-free DNA in plasma. However, it may need further optimization to surpass the performance of qPCR.

Indexed as

ActinsAutoantigensDNAFemaleGestational AgeHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRibonuclease PTrophoblastsTumor Suppressor ProteinsActinsAutoantigensDNARASSF1 protein, humanRibonuclease PRPP30 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24987984
PMCPMC4079713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.