Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24987703›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2014

Endometriosis patients in the postmenopausal period: pre- and postmenopausal factors influencing postmenopausal health.

Dietmar Haas, Peter Wurm, Wolfgang Schimetta, Kathrin Schabetsberger, Andreas Shamiyeh, Peter Oppelt, Helge Binder

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dietmar HaasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's General Hospital, Krankenhausstraße 26-30, 4021 Linz, Austria ; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany ; Faculty of Medicine, Johannes Kepler Univerity, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0044-1407
Peter WurmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's General Hospital, Krankenhausstraße 26-30, 4021 Linz, Austria ; Faculty of Medicine, Johannes Kepler Univerity, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.
Wolfgang SchimettaDepartment of Applied Systems Research and Statistics, Johannes Kepler University, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0893-066X
Kathrin SchabetsbergerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's General Hospital, Krankenhausstraße 26-30, 4021 Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2967-5293
Andreas ShamiyehFaculty of Medicine, Johannes Kepler Univerity, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria ; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Operative Laparoscopy, Second Surgical Department, Linz General Hospital, Krankenhausstraße 9, 4021 Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6068-0824
Peter OppeltDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's General Hospital, Krankenhausstraße 26-30, 4021 Linz, Austria ; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany ; Faculty of Medicine, Johannes Kepler Univerity, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.
Helge BinderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's General Hospital, Krankenhausstraße 26-30, 4021 Linz, Austria ; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Universitätsstraße 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cantonal Hospital Uri, Spitalstraße 1, 6460 Altdorf, Switzerland.
Johannes Kepler University of Linz · ATUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEWomen's General Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate patients' health status and the course of endometriosis from the premenopausal to the postmenopausal period and evaluate influencing factors that may be relevant.

methodsQuestionnaire completed by 35 postmenopausal women in whom endometriosis had been histologically confirmed premenopausally. Correlation and regression analyses were carried out to identify factors relevant to their postmenopausal health status.

resultsOverall, there was clear improvement in typical endometriosis symptoms and sexual life. Clear associations (P < 0.005) were observed between premenopausal factors like physical limitations caused by the disease, impaired social contacts and psychological problems, and postmenopausal pain and impairment of sexual life. Three statistical models for assessing pain and impairment of sexual life in the postmenopausal period were calculated on the basis of clinical symptoms in the premenopausal period, with a very high degree of accuracy (P < 0.001; R(2) = 0.833/0.857/0.931).

conclusionsThe results of the survey strongly suggest that physical fitness and freedom from physical restrictions, a good social environment, and psychological care in both the premenopausal and postmenopausal periods lead to marked improvements in the postmenopausal period with regard to pain, dyspareunia, and influence on sexual life in endometriosis patients.

Indexed as

PostmenopausePremenopauseSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesWomen's HealthAgedEndometriosisFemaleHumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24987703
PMCPMC4058668
OpenAlexW2108047494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.