ReviewAnnals of maxillofacial surgery2014
Soft tissue engineering in craniomaxillofacial surgery.
Review in Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D bioprinting the human chest wall: Fiction or fact.npj biomedical innovations · 2024Review
- Trends of regenerative tissue engineering for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction in veterinary medicine.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Review
- Recent trends and perspectives in reconstruction and regeneration of intra/extra-oral wounds using tissue-engineered oral mucosa equivalents.The Japanese dental science review · 2023Review
- Engineering Heart Valve Interfaces Using Melt Electrowriting: Biomimetic Design Strategies from Multi-Modal Imaging.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- Advances in Tissue Engineering and Implications for Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction.Journal of the California Dental Association · 2021Article
- Basic Principles of Bioengineering and Regeneration.Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America · 2017Review
- 3D-Printing Technologies for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2017Review
- Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryReview
- Evaluation of bioactivity and biodegradability of a biomimetic soft tissue scaffold for clinical use: AnJournal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Craniofacial soft tissue reconstruction may be required following trauma, tumor resection, and to repair congenital deformities. Recent advances in the field of tissue engineering have significantly widened the reconstructive armamentarium of the surgeon. The successful identification and combination of tissue engineering, scaffold, progenitor cells, and physiologic signaling molecules has enabled the surgeon to design, recreate the missing tissue in its near natural form. This has resolved the issues like graft rejection, wound dehiscence, or poor vascularity. Successfully reconstructed tissue through soft tissue engineering protocols would help surgeon to restore the form and function of the lost tissue in its originality. This manuscript intends to provide a glimpse of the basic principle of tissue engineering, contemporary, and future direction of this field as applied to craniofacial surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.