ArticleFrontiers in physiology2014
Correlations and coherence of monopolar EMG-currents of the medial gastrocnemius muscle in proximal and distal compartments.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Task-Dependent Intermuscular Motor Unit Synchronization between Medial and Lateral Vastii Muscles during Dynamic and Isometric Squats.PloS one · 2015Trial
- EMG-EMG coherence during voluntary control of human standing tasks: a systematic scoping review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Contribution of the peroneus longus neuromuscular compartments to eversion and plantarflexion of the ankle.PloS one · 2021Article
- Intermuscular Coherence Between Surface EMG Signals Is Higher for Monopolar Compared to Bipolar Electrode Configurations.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- Motor Unit Action Potential Clustering-Theoretical Consideration for Muscle Activation during a Motor Task.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018Article
- Development of a multichannel current-EMG system for coherence modulation with visual biofeedback.PloS one · 2018Article
- Motor units in the human medial gastrocnemius muscle are not spatially localized or functionally grouped.The Journal of physiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The penniform gastrocnemius muscle contains multiple heads in the proximal regions, and the aponeuroses are attached to the Achilles tendon. The multiple head structure lead to the assumption that different regions of the muscle must be activated compartment wise. The purpose of this study was to compare the correlation and coherence of EMG-currents within and between proximal and distal compartments of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, which reflect underling synchronization of motor units. It was hypothesized and shown that phase inverted signals represent a property that discriminates compartments. However, the phase inverted and non-inverted signals showed values of correlations that were indicative for highly synchronized signals. The correlation increased with the complexity of the task and was higher for the calf rising movement than while balancing in a tiptoe position. Because the muscle fibers do not span the whole length of the muscles, one has to conclude that the MUs were synchronized by synchronizing the various motor nerves. This study shows that it is essential to measure monopolar signals and use non-isometric contractions to observe synchronization of the EMG-signals. One could speculate that compartmental differences can only be observed if more complex movements that generate rotational forces at the knee or ankle are used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.