Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24987370›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2014

Multiple policies to enhance prescribing efficiency for established medicines in Europe with a particular focus on demand-side measures: findings and future implications.

Brian Godman, Bjorn Wettermark, Menno van Woerkom, Jessica Fraeyman, Samantha Alvarez-Madrazo, Christian Berg, Iain Bishop, Anna Bucsics, Stephen Campbell, Alexander E Finlayson and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
57.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 18 institutions in 13 countries.

Brian GodmanDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge Stockholm, Sweden ; Medicines Use and Health, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde Glasgow, UK ; Liverpool Health Economics Centre, University of Liverpool Management School Liverpool, UK.
Bjorn WettermarkDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge Stockholm, Sweden ; Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Healthcare Development, Public Healthcare Services Committee, Stockholm County Council Stockholm, Sweden.
Menno van WoerkomDutch Institute for Rational Use of Medicines Utrecht, Netherlands.
Jessica FraeymanEpidemiology and Social Medicine, Research Group Medical Sociology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp Antwerp, Belgium.
Samantha Alvarez-MadrazoMedicines Use and Health, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde Glasgow, UK.
Christian BergDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo, Norway.
Iain BishopPublic Health and Intelligence Business Unit, National Services NHS Scotland Edinburgh, UK.
Anna BucsicsDepartment of Finance, Faculty of Business, Economics and Statistics, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria ; Department of Reimbursement, Hauptverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger Vienna, Austria.
Stephen CampbellCentre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester Manchester, UK.
Alexander E FinlaysonGreen Templeton College, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Jurij FürstHealth Insurance Institute Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Kristina GaruolieneDepartment of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Vilnius Vilnius, Lithuania ; Medicines Reimbursement Department, National Health Insurance Fund Vilnius, Lithuania.
Harald HerholzKasemarzliche Vereinigung Hessen Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marija KalabaDepartment of Medicines and Pharmacoeconomics, Republic Fund for Health Insurance Belgrade, Serbia.
Ott LaiusState Agency of Medicines Tartu, Estonia.
Jutta PiessneggerDepartment of Reimbursement, Hauptverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger Vienna, Austria.
Catherine SermetIRDES Paris, France.
Ulrich SchwabeInstitute of Pharmacology, University of Heidelberg Heidelberg, Germany.
Vera V Vlahović-PalčevskiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Rijeka Rijeka, Croatia.
Vanda Markovic-PekovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka Banja Luka, Republic Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina ; Ministry of Health and Social Welfare Banja Luka, Republic Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Luka VončinaMinistry of Health Republic of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Kamila MalinowskaDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Public Health School Warsaw, Poland ; Drug Management Department, National Health Fund Warsaw, Poland.
Corinne ZaraBarcelona Health Region, Catalan Health Service Barcelona, Spain.
Lars L GustafssonDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge Stockholm, Sweden.
University of Strathclyde · GBHealth Insurance Institute of Slovenia · SIHeidelberg University · DEInstitut de Recherche et de Documentation en Économie de la Santé · FRInstituut voor Verantwoord Medicijngebruik · NLKarolinska Institutet · SEManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBMinistry of Health · HRNational Health Insurance Fund · RSNational Health Service Scotland · GBNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOStockholm County Council · SEUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Banja Luka · BAUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Rijeka · HRUniversity of Vienna · ATVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe appreciable growth in pharmaceutical expenditure has resulted in multiple initiatives across Europe to lower generic prices and enhance their utilization. However, considerable variation in their use and prices.

objectiveAssess the influence of multiple supply and demand-side initiatives across Europe for established medicines to enhance prescribing efficiency before a decision to prescribe a particular medicine. Subsequently utilize the findings to suggest potential future initiatives that countries could consider.

methodAn analysis of different methodologies involving cross national and single country retrospective observational studies on reimbursed use and expenditure of PPIs, statins, and renin-angiotensin inhibitor drugs among European countries.

resultsNature and intensity of the various initiatives appreciably influenced prescribing behavior and expenditure, e.g., multiple measures resulted in reimbursed expenditure for PPIs in Scotland in 2010 56% below 2001 levels despite a 3-fold increase in utilization and in the Netherlands, PPI expenditure fell by 58% in 2010 vs. 2000 despite a 3-fold increase in utilization. A similar picture was seen with prescribing restrictions, i.e., (i) more aggressive follow-up of prescribing restrictions for patented statins and ARBs resulted in a greater reduction in the utilization of patented statins in Austria vs. Norway and lower utilization of patented ARBs vs. generic ACEIs in Croatia than Austria. However, limited impact of restrictions on esomeprazole in Norway with the first prescription or recommendation in hospital where restrictions do not apply. Similar findings when generic losartan became available in Western Europe.

conclusionsMultiple demand-side measures are needed to influence prescribing patterns. When combined with supply-side measures, activities can realize appreciable savings. Health authorities cannot rely on a "spill over" effect between classes to affect changes in prescribing.

Indexed as

demand-side measuresdrug utilization studiesgenericsPPIsrenin-angiotensin inhibitor drugsstatins

Identifiers

PMID24987370
PMCPMC4060455
OpenAlexW2111321650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.