Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24987343›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2014

Sweet taste liking is associated with impulsive behaviors in humans.

Jessica Weafer, Anne Burkhardt, Harriet de Wit

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03810703 (Hypomania, Amphetamine, and Preferences for Sweets), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03810703 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Hypomania, Amphetamine, and Preferences for Sweets

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ChicagoRan2017 to 2018Enrolled93ConditionsBipolar II DisorderArmsPlacebo oral capsule, d-amphetamine 10 mg oral capsule, d-amphetamine 20 mg oral capsule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica WeaferDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA.
Anne BurkhardtDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA.
Harriet de WitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoUL1TR000430 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$20.2M
Determinants of Drug Preference in Humans--Administrative SupplementR01DA002812 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 1985 to 2024
$10.6M
The genetic basis of impulsive behavior in humansR01DA032015 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
Impulsivity and Stimulant Drug RewardF32DA033756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WEAFER, JESSICA J · 2012 to 2014
$130k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000430NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA033756NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002812NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence from both human and animal studies suggests that sensitivity to rewarding stimuli is positively associated with impulsive behaviors, including both impulsive decision making and inhibitory control. The current study examined associations between the hedonic value of a sweet taste and two forms of impulsivity (impulsive choice and impulsive action) in healthy young adults (N = 100). Participants completed a sweet taste test in which they rated their liking of various sweetness concentrations. Subjects also completed measures of impulsive choice (delay discounting), and impulsive action (go/no-go task). Subjects who discounted more steeply (i.e., greater impulsive choice) liked the high sweetness concentration solutions more. By contrast, sweet liking was not related to impulsive action. These findings indicate that impulsive choice may be associated with heightened sensitivity to the hedonic value of a rewarding stimulus, and that these constructs might share common underlying neurobiological mechanisms.

Indexed as

decision-makingdelay discountingimpulsive actionimpulsive choicereward sensitivitysucrosesweet taste

Identifiers

PMID24987343
PMCPMC4060557
OpenAlexW2005717403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.