Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24987342›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2014

Ethanol exposure interacts with training conditions to influence behavioral adaptation to a negative instrumental contingency.

Regina A Mangieri, Roberto U Cofresí, Rueben A Gonzales

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Habit, choice, and addiction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Defining the place of habit in substance use disorders.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Regina A MangieriDivision of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
Roberto U CofresíDivision of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
Rueben A GonzalesDivision of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Neurochemical mechanisms of ethanol self-administrationR37AA011852 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI GONZALES, RUEBEN A. · 2009 to 2018
$2.8M
The role of the endogenous cannabinoid system in ethanol self-administrationF32AA018252 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MANGIERI, REGINA A. · 2009 to 2010
$98k
NIAAA NIH HHS F32 AA018252NIAAA NIH HHS R37 AA011852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported that, in male, Long Evans rats, instrumental lever pressing that had been reinforced during limited training under a variable interval (VI) schedule by oral self-administration of a 10% sucrose/10% ethanol (10S10E) solution was insensitive to devaluation of 10S10E. In contrast, lever pressing that had been reinforced under a variable ratio (VR) schedule, or by self-administration of 10% sucrose (10S) alone, was sensitive to outcome devaluation. The relative insensitivity to outcome devaluation indicated that seeking of 10S10E by the VI-trained rats had become an instrumental habit. In the present study we employed an alternative operational definition of an instrumental habit and compared the effect of reversing the action-outcome contingency on lever press performance by rats trained under the same experimental conditions. Male Long Evans rats received daily operant training, in which lever presses were reinforced by 10S10E or 10S, under VI or VR schedules. After nine sessions of VI or VR training, rats were tested over four sessions in which the instrumental contingency was changed so that a lever press would prevent reinforcer delivery for 120 s. We found that rats that had been trained to lever press for 10S10E under the VR schedule showed a greater change in lever pressing across testing sessions than those that had received 10S10E reinforcement under the VI schedule. There was no such interaction with reinforcement schedule for rats that had received only 10S reinforcement during training. These findings are consistent with those of our previous study, and provide further evidence that addition of ethanol to sucrose may promote habitual responding in an instrumental task.

Indexed as

ethanolhabitinstrumental learningLong Evans ratsomission contingencysucrose

Identifiers

PMID24987342
PMCPMC4060087
OpenAlexW2167493352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.