Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24987271›Full record

ReviewClinical medicine insights. Reproductive health2014

Management of Vaginal Atrophy: Implications from the REVIVE Survey.

Susan Wysocki, Sheryl Kingsberg, Michael Krychman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical medicine insights. Reproductive health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Fractional COJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Economic Evaluation of SenshioApplied health economics and health policy · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Menopause and Sexuality.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan WysockiiWomansHealth, Washington, DC, USA.
Sheryl KingsbergMacDonald Women's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Michael KrychmanSouthern California Center for Sexual Health and Survivorship Medicine, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
Southern California Reproductive Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic and progressive medical condition common in postmenopausal women. Symptoms of VVA such as dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, irritation, and itching can negatively impact sexual function and quality of life. The REVIVE (REal Women's VIews of Treatment Options for Menopausal Vaginal ChangEs) survey assessed knowledge about VVA and recorded attitudes about interactions with healthcare providers (HCPs) and available treatment options for VVA. The REVIVE survey identified unmet needs of women with VVA symptoms such as poor understanding of the condition, poor communication with HCPs despite the presence of vaginal symptoms, and concerns about the safety, convenience, and efficacy of available VVA treatments. HCPs can address these unmet needs by proactively identifying patients with VVA and educating them about the condition as well as discussing treatment preferences and available therapies for VVA.

Indexed as

postmenopausalREVIVE surveytreatment strategiesvulvar and vaginal atrophy

Identifiers

PMID24987271
PMCPMC4071759
OpenAlexW2027416853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.