Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24987170›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pharmacology

Animal use in pharmacology education and research: the changing scenario.

Dinesh K Badyal, Chetna Desai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Validation of portable electronic equipment (AccutrendJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Looking into the Eyes-In Vitro Models for Ocular Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Sinapicacid Inhibits Group IIA Secretory Phospholipase AAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Recent Advances inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dinesh K BadyalDepartment of Pharmacology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India.
Chetna DesaiDepartment of Pharmacology, BJ Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of animals in research and education dates back to the period when humans started to look for ways to prevent and cure ailments. Most of present day's drug discoveries were possible because of the use of animals in research. The dilemma to continue animal experiments in education and research continues with varied and confusing guidelines. However, the animal use and their handling vary in each laboratory and educational institution. It has been reported that the animals are being subjected to painful procedures in education and training unnecessarily. The extensive use of animals in toxicity studies and testing dermatological preparations has raised concerns about the ways animals are sacrificed for these "irrelevant experiments". On the other side of the coin are scientists who advocate the relevant and judicious use of animals in research so that new discoveries can continue. In this review, we discuss the evolution of the use of animals in education and research and how these have been affected in recent times owing to concerns from animal lovers and government regulations. A number of computer simulation and other models have been recommended for use as alternatives to use of animals for pharmacology education. In this review we also discuss some of these alternatives.

Indexed as

Animal ExperimentationAnimalsBiomedical ResearchDrug DiscoveryGovernment RegulationPharmacologyAlternativesanimal experimentspharmacology educationregulations

Identifiers

PMID24987170
PMCPMC4071700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.