ReviewInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2014
Optimizing pharmacotherapy of systemic lupus erythematosus: the pharmacist role.
Review in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of biologics and targeted small-molecule therapies plus stable background therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Silent lupus nephritis: a pediatric center experience of baseline kidney biopsies and review of the published evidence.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Pooled it
- Sequential Triple Therapy for Facial Inflammation: Prospective Evaluation of Facial Microneedle, Hydrolifting, and Intense Pulsed Light Therapy.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease that can affect any part of the body. The management of the disease includes nonpharmacotherapy and pharmacotherapy. AIM OF THE REVIEW: To provide an up-to-date review of the etiology, epidemiology, clinical features, diagnostic findings, and treatment options for SLE. METHODS DATA SOURCE: A PubMed search of English language journals using a combination of words--elderly, SLE, late onset SLE, etiology, screening, diagnosis, or treatment to identify original studies, guidelines, and reviews on SLE, SLE, late onset SLE published between 2000 and present. Overall, original studies, clinical reviews, references, and guidelines were obtained and evaluated on their clinical relevance. The literature included guidelines and considerations for the etiology, diagnosis, screening, and management of SLE, late onset SLE.
resultsSLE is a chronic autoimmune disorder, the exact etiology of which is unknown. SLE predominately affects younger women; however, it is reported to occur in up to 20 % of patients 50 years or older. In patients with SLE, nearly every system in the body is affected with varying degrees of severity ranging from subclinical to fatal. The hallmark feature of SLE is the production of autoantibodies directed primarily against nuclear antigens, but also against cytoplasmic components of cells.
conclusionThe diagnosis of SLE is based on criteria set by the American College of Rheumatology. Management is individualized and depends on presenting symptoms and reducing the likelihood of permanent damage to organs and tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.