ArticleGenome research2014
DNA replication and transcription programs respond to the same chromatin cues.
Article in Genome research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell type- and chromosome-specific chromatin landscapes and DNA replication programs ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Emergence of enhancers at late DNA replicating regions.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Multi-Scale Imaging of the Dynamic Organization of Chromatin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- ATXN3 controls DNA replication and transcription by regulating chromatin structure.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Distinct signaling signatures drive compensatory proliferation via S-phase acceleration.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- A Protocol for Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Replication Timing in Intact Root Tips.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- The MOZ-BRPF1 acetyltransferase complex in epigenetic crosstalk linked to gene regulation, development, and human diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- The Fkh1 Forkhead associated domain promotes ORC binding to a subset of DNA replication origins in budding yeast.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Rtt109 slows replication speed by histone N-terminal acetylation.Genome research · 2021Article
- Comparing DNA replication programs reveals large timing shifts at centromeres of endocycling cells in maize roots.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- 3D genome organization contributes to genome instability at fragile sites.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Rif1 Functions in a Tissue-Specific Manner To Control Replication Timing Through Its PP1-Binding Motif.Genetics · 2020Article
- Differences in firing efficiency, chromatin, and transcription underlie the developmental plasticity of theGenome research · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- RNA-on-X 1 and 2 in Drosophila melanogaster fulfill separate functions in dosage compensation.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Chromatin conformation and transcriptional activity are permissive regulators of DNA replication initiation inGenome research · 2018Article
- Review
- Dynamic changes in ORC localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- H3K36me3-mediated mismatch repair preferentially protects actively transcribed genes from mutation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA replication is a dynamic process that occurs in a temporal order along each of the chromosomes. A consequence of the temporally coordinated activation of replication origins is the establishment of broad domains (>100 kb) that replicate either early or late in S phase. This partitioning of the genome into early and late replication domains is important for maintaining genome stability, gene dosage, and epigenetic inheritance; however, the molecular mechanisms that define and establish these domains are poorly understood. The modENCODE Project provided an opportunity to investigate the chromatin features that define the Drosophila replication timing program in multiple cell lines. The majority of early and late replicating domains in the Drosophila genome were static across all cell lines; however, a small subset of domains was dynamic and exhibited differences in replication timing between the cell lines. Both origin selection and activation contribute to defining the DNA replication program. Our results suggest that static early and late replicating domains were defined at the level of origin selection (ORC binding) and likely mediated by chromatin accessibility. In contrast, dynamic domains exhibited low ORC densities in both cell types, suggesting that origin activation and not origin selection governs the plasticity of the DNA replication program. Finally, we show that the male-specific early replication of the X chromosome is dependent on the dosage compensation complex (DCC), suggesting that the transcription and replication programs respond to the same chromatin cues. Specifically, MOF-mediated hyperacetylation of H4K16 on the X chromosome promotes both the up-regulation of male-specific transcription and origin activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.