Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24985891›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

Effects of pramipexole on the acquisition of responding with opioid-conditioned reinforcement in the rat.

Jeremiah W Bertz, Jianyong Chen, James H Woods

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The adverse effects of pramipexole on probability discounting are not reversed by acute DEuropean neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  4. Making Sense of: Sensitization in Schizophrenia.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Individual variation in the motivational and neurobiological effects of an opioid cue.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremiah W BertzDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1301 MSRB III, 1150 W. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109 -5632, USA, jwbertz@umich.edu.
Jianyong Chen
James H Woods
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN THE BIOLOGY OF DRUG ABUSET32DA007268 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TRAYNOR, JOHN R. · 1991 to 2021
$6.7M
Design, synthesis and characterization of dopamine receptor 3 ligandsR01DA020669 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WANG, SHAOMENG · 2006 to 2010
$2.9M
Potent and Highly Selective D3 Ligands for the Treatment of Cocaine AbuseR01DA032943 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WANG, SHAOMENG · 2012 to 2014
$2.0M
Dopamine D2/D3 Receptors in Compulsive DisordersR01DA024897 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WOODS, JAMES H · 2009 to 2012
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020669NIDA NIH HHS R01DA020669NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024897NIDA NIH HHS R01DA024897NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032943NIDA NIH HHS R01DA032943NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007268NIDA NIH HHS T32DA07268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDopamine D3 receptor-preferring ligands may be able to modify the conditioned reinforcing effects of drug-associated stimuli. In evaluating the effects of these compounds, it is important to clarify the extent to which responding depends on (1) conditioned reinforcement vs. other behavioral mechanisms and (2) dopamine D3 vs. D2 receptor activity.

objectivesTo use behaviorally stringent new-response acquisition procedures to characterize the effects of the D3-preferring agonist, pramipexole, on the conditioned reinforcing effects of a stimulus paired with the opioid agonist, remifentanil.

methodsFirst, in Pavlovian conditioning (PAV) sessions, rats received response-independent IV injections of remifentanil and presentations of a light-noise stimulus. In separate groups, injections and stimuli either always co-occurred ("paired PAV") or occurred with no consistent relationship ("random PAV" control). Next, in instrumental acquisition (ACQ) sessions, all animals could respond in two nose-poke manipulanda: an active nose-poke, which produced the stimulus alone, or an inactive nose-poke. Pramipexole was injected SC prior to ACQ sessions with or without pretreatments of the D3-preferring antagonist, SB-277011A, or the D2-preferring antagonist, L-741,626.

resultsAfter paired PAV, but not random PAV, rats acquired nose-poke responding during ACQ (i.e., active > inactive). Pramipexole dose-dependently increased active responding without changing inactive responding. Pramipexole-induced increases in responding were blocked by pretreatment with L-741,626, but not SB-277011A.

conclusionsPramipexole specifically enhanced remifentanil-conditioned reinforcement: active responding was selectively increased only after the stimulus was paired with remifentanil. Although pramipexole is D3-preferring, the antagonist effects obtained presently suggest an important role for the D2 receptor in opioid-conditioned reinforcement.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsBenzothiazolesConditioning, ClassicalDopamine AgonistsDose-Response Relationship, DrugMalePiperidinesPramipexoleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRemifentanilTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidBenzothiazolesDopamine AgonistsPiperidinesPramipexoleRemifentanil

Identifiers

PMID24985891
PMCPMC4282623
OpenAlexW2054736245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.