Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24985730›Full record

SynthesisTobacco control2015

Economic evaluations of tobacco control mass media campaigns: a systematic review.

Edwinah Atusingwize, Sarah Lewis, Tessa Langley

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tobacco control, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mass media interventions for smoking cessation in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Exploring Perspectives Towards the Gambling Industry and Its Marketing Strategies Among Young People in Western Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Smoking, health-related quality of life and economic evaluation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edwinah AtusingwizeDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sarah LewisDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Tessa LangleyDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J00023X/1Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational evidence shows that mass media campaigns are effective tobacco control interventions. However, they require substantial investment; a key question is whether their costs are justified by their benefits. The aim of this study was to systematically and comprehensively review economic evaluations of tobacco control mass media campaigns.

methodsAn electronic search of databases and grey literature was conducted to identify all published economic evaluations of tobacco control mass media campaigns. The authors reviewed studies independently and assessed the quality of studies using the Drummond 10-point checklist. A narrative synthesis was used to summarise the key features and quality of the identified studies.

results10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. All the studies included a cost effectiveness analysis, a cost utility analysis or both. The methods were highly heterogeneous, particularly in terms of the types of costs included. On the whole, studies were well conducted, but the interventions were often poorly described in terms of campaign content and intensity, and cost information was frequently inadequate. All studies concluded that tobacco control mass media campaigns are a cost effective public health intervention.

conclusionsThe evidence on the cost effectiveness of tobacco control mass media campaigns is limited, but of acceptable quality and consistently suggests that they offer good value for money.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMass MediaTobacco Use CessationCessationEconomicsMedia

Identifiers

PMID24985730
PMCPMC4484382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.