Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24985125›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2015

Array-CGH in children with mild intellectual disability: a population-based study.

Charles Coutton, Klaus Dieterich, Véronique Satre, Gaëlle Vieville, Florence Amblard, Marie David, Christine Cans, Pierre-Simon Jouk, Francoise Devillard

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Promoter of PorcineFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charles CouttonLaboratoire de Génétique Chromosomique, Département de Génétique et Procréation, Hôpital Couple Enfant, CHU Grenoble, 38700, Grenoble, France, CCoutton@chu-grenoble.fr.
Klaus Dieterich
Véronique Satre
Gaëlle Vieville
Florence Amblard
Marie David
Christine Cans
Pierre-Simon Jouk
Francoise Devillard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIntellectual disability (ID) is characterized by limitation in intellectual function and adaptive behavior, with onset in childhood. Frequent identifiable causes of ID originate from chromosomal imbalances. During the last years, array-CGH has successfully contributed to improve the diagnostic detection rate of genetic abnormalities in patients with ID. Most array-CGH studies focused on patients with moderate or severe intellectual disability. Studies on genetic etiology in children with mild intellectual disability (ID) are very rare. We performed array-CGH analysis in 66 children with mild intellectual disability assessed in a population-based study and for whom no genetic etiology was identified. We found one or more copy number variations (CNVs) in 20 out of 66 (~30 %) patients with a mild ID. In eight of them (~12 %), the CNVs were certainly responsible for the phenotype and in six they were potentially pathogenic for ID. Altogether, array-CGH helped to determine the etiology of ID in 14 patients (~21 %).

conclusionOur results underscore the clinical relevance of array-CGH to investigate the etiology of isolated idiopathic mild ID in patients or associated with even subtle dysmorphic features or congenital malformations.

Indexed as

AdolescentComparative Genomic HybridizationDevelopmental DisabilitiesDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleProtein Array Analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.