Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24984566›Full record

ArticleClinical lung cancer2014

Identification of ENO1 as a potential sputum biomarker for early-stage lung cancer by shotgun proteomics.

Lei Yu, Jun Shen, Kaiissar Mannoor, Maria Guarnera, Feng Jiang

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical lung cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Role and Significance of Bioactive Substances in Sputum
 in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Microbiota Biomarkers for Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Leukotriene AFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Article
  16. Sputum long non-coding RNA biomarkers for diagnosis of lung cancer.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lei Yu *Departments of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jun Shen *Departments of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Kaiissar MannoorDepartments of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Maria GuarneraDepartments of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Feng JiangDepartments of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Non-invasive Biomarker Panels for Early Detection of Lung Squamous Cell CarcinomaR01CA161837 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JIANG, FENG · 2011 to 2013
$998k
Early detection of lung cancer in VeteransI01CX000512 · VA · BALTIMORE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIANG, FENG · 2012 to 2020
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000512NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161837NCI NIH HHS R01CA161837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer is the leading cancer killer. Early detection will reduce the related deaths. The objective of this study was to identify potential biomarkers for early-stage lung cancer in sputum supernatant. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing shotgun proteomics, we detected changes in protein profiles that were associated with lung cancer by analyzing sputum supernatants from 6 patients with early-stage lung cancer and 5 cancer-free controls. Using western blotting, we validated the proteomic results in 22 lung cancer cases and 22 controls. Using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the biomarker candidates in an independent set of 35 cases and 36 controls.

resultsProteomics identified 8 biomarker candidates for lung cancer. Western blotting validation of the candidates showed that enolase 1 (ENO1) displayed a higher expression level in patients with cancer than in cancer-free individuals (P = .015). ELISA revealed that the assessment of ENO1 expression in sputum supernatant had 58.33% sensitivity and 80.00% specificity in distinguishing patients with stage I lung cancer from cancer-free individuals.

conclusionThe analysis of protein biomarkers in sputum may provide a potential approach for the early detection of lung cancer. Future validation of all the candidates defined by shotgun proteomics in a large cohort study may help develop additional biomarkers that can be added to ENO1 to provide more diagnostic efficacy for lung cancer.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorBlotting, WesternCase-Control StudiesDNA-Binding ProteinsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm StagingPhosphopyruvate HydrataseProteomicsSensitivity and SpecificitySputumBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsENO1 protein, humanPhosphopyruvate HydrataseTumor Suppressor ProteinsBiomarkerENO1Lung cancerProteomicsSputum

Identifiers

PMID24984566
PMCPMC4160401
OpenAlexW2169615687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.