Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24983465›Full record

ReviewPLoS biology2014

Sex determination: why so many ways of doing it?

Doris Bachtrog, Judith E Mank, Catherine L Peichel, Mark Kirkpatrick, Sarah P Otto, Tia-Lynn Ashman, Matthew W Hahn, Jun Kitano, Itay Mayrose, Ray Ming and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 599 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
599citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
47.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

599 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,270 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Rapid turnover of sex-determining architecture in invasive mussels.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Sex Determination in Sponges.Molecular reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Chromosome-specific drift under stabilizing selection generates polygenic barriers to sex chromosome turnover.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

539 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 14 institutions in 6 countries.

Doris BachtrogUniversity of California, Berkeley, Department of Integrative Biology, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Judith E MankUniversity College London, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, London, United Kingdom.
Catherine L PeichelFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Divisions of Human Biology and Basic Sciences, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Mark KirkpatrickUniversity of Texas, Department of Integrative Biology, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Sarah P OttoUniversity of British Columbia, Department of Zoology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tia-Lynn AshmanUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Biological Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Matthew W HahnIndiana University, Department of Biology, Bloomington Indiana, United States of America.
Jun KitanoNational Institute of Genetics, Ecological Genetics Laboratory, Mishima, Shizuoka, Japan.
Itay MayroseTel Aviv University, Department of Molecular Biology and Ecology of Plants, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ray MingUniversity of Illinois, Department of Plant Biology, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.
Nicolas PerrinUniversity of Lausanne, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laura RossUniversity of Oxford, Department of Zoology, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nicole ValenzuelaIowa State University, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Jana C VamosiUniversity of Calgary, Department of Biological Sciences, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Tree of Sex Consortium
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USIndiana University Bloomington · USIowa State University · USNational Institute of Genetics · JPTel Aviv University · ILThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

The evolution of dosage compensation in DrosophilaR01GM076007 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BACHTROG, DORIS · 2006 to 2020
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual reproduction is an ancient feature of life on earth, and the familiar X and Y chromosomes in humans and other model species have led to the impression that sex determination mechanisms are old and conserved. In fact, males and females are determined by diverse mechanisms that evolve rapidly in many taxa. Yet this diversity in primary sex-determining signals is coupled with conserved molecular pathways that trigger male or female development. Conflicting selection on different parts of the genome and on the two sexes may drive many of these transitions, but few systems with rapid turnover of sex determination mechanisms have been rigorously studied. Here we survey our current understanding of how and why sex determination evolves in animals and plants and identify important gaps in our knowledge that present exciting research opportunities to characterize the evolutionary forces and molecular pathways underlying the evolution of sex determination.

Indexed as

Sex Determination ProcessesAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleHermaphroditic OrganismsHumansMaleSex ChromosomesX ChromosomeY Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID24983465
PMCPMC4077654
OpenAlexW2155150900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.