Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24983424›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2014

Mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Susana Gardete, Alexander Tomasz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 238 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
238citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

238 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 556 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Vancomycin tolerance and dispersion of dual species biofilms ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

178 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susana Gardete
Alexander Tomasz
Rockefeller University · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS 2 R01 AI457838-14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vancomycin is a glycopeptide antibiotic used for the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections. Traditionally, it has been used as a drug of last resort; however, clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin (vancomycin intermediate-resistant S. aureus [VISA]) and more recently with high-level vancomycin resistance (vancomycin-resistant S. aureus [VRSA]) have been described in the clinical literature. The rare VRSA strains carry transposon Tn1546, acquired from vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, which is known to alter cell wall structure and metabolism, but the resistance mechanisms in VISA isolates are less well defined. Herein, we review selected mechanistic aspects of resistance in VISA and summarize biochemical studies on cell wall synthesis in a VRSA strain. Finally, we recapitulate a model that integrates common mechanistic features of VRSA and VISA strains and is consistent with the mode of action of vancomycin.

Indexed as

Vancomycin ResistanceCell WallDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable ElementsGenes, BacterialHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, BiologicalMutationStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusVirulenceDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID24983424
PMCPMC4071404
OpenAlexW1983784984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.