Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24983352›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Development of a native Escherichia coli induction system for ionic liquid tolerance.

Marijke Frederix, Kimmo Hütter, Jessica Leu, Tanveer S Batth, William J Turner, Thomas L Rüegg, Harvey W Blanch, Blake A Simmons, Paul D Adams, Jay D Keasling and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Horsing around:Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  2. Biodegradation of aromatic pollutants meets synthetic biology.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  3. Spontaneous Phage Resistance in Avian PathogenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Performing selections under dynamic conditions for synthetic biology applications.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Analytics for Metabolic Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Marijke FrederixJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America; Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Kimmo HütterJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America; Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Jessica LeuJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America; Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Tanveer S BatthJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America; Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
William J TurnerSchool of Engineering, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.
Thomas L RüeggJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America; Botanical Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Biology and Biotechnology Division, Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.
Harvey W BlanchJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America; Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America; Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Blake A SimmonsJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America; Biological and Materials Science Center, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California, United States of America.
Paul D AdamsJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America; Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Jay D KeaslingJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America; Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America; Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America; Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Michael P ThelenJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America; Biology and Biotechnology Division, Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.
Mary J DunlopSchool of Engineering, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.
Christopher J PetzoldJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America; Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Aindrila MukhopadhyayJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America; Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to solubilize lignocellulose makes certain ionic liquids (ILs) very effective reagents for pretreating biomass prior to its saccharification for biofuel fermentation. However, residual IL in the aqueous sugar solution can inhibit the growth and function of biofuel-producing microorganisms. In E. coli this toxicity can be partially overcome by the heterologous expression of an IL efflux pump encoded by eilA from Enterobacter lignolyticus. In the present work, we used microarray analysis to identify native E. coli IL-inducible promoters and develop control systems for regulating eilA gene expression. Three candidate promoters, PmarR', PydfO', and PydfA', were selected and compared to the IPTG-inducible PlacUV5 system for controlling expression of eilA. The PydfA' and PmarR' based systems are as effective as PlacUV5 in their ability to rescue E. coli from typically toxic levels of IL, thereby eliminating the need to use an IPTG-based system for such tolerance engineering. We present a mechanistic model indicating that inducible control systems reduce target gene expression when IL levels are low. Selected-reaction monitoring mass spectrometry analysis revealed that at high IL concentrations EilA protein levels were significantly elevated under the control of PydfA' and PmarR' in comparison to the other promoters. Further, in a pooled culture competition designed to determine fitness, the strain containing pPmarR'-eilA outcompeted strains with other promoter constructs, most significantly at IL concentrations above 150 mM. These results indicate that native promoters such as PmarR' can provide effective systems for regulating the expression of heterologous genes in host engineering and simplify the development of industrially useful strains.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsIonic LiquidsPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, BacterialTranscriptomeEilA protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsIonic LiquidsRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID24983352
PMCPMC4077768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.